- Review Article
- Open access
- Published:
Microbial cellulase production and its potential application for textile industries
Annals of Microbiology volume 73, Article number: 13 (2023)
Abstract
Purpose
The textile industry’s previous chemical use resulted in thousands of practical particulate emissions, such as machine component damage and drainage system blockage, both of which have practical implications. Enzyme-based textile processing is cost-effective, environmentally friendly, non-hazardous, and water-saving. The purpose of this review is to give evidence on the potential activity of microbial cellulase in the textile industry, which is mostly confined to the realm of research.
Methods
This review was progressive by considering peer-reviewed papers linked to microbial cellulase production, and its prospective application for textile industries was appraised and produced to develop this assessment. Articles were divided into two categories based on the results of trustworthy educational journals: methods used to produce the diversity of microorganisms through fermentation processes and such approaches used to produce the diversity of microbes through microbial fermentation. Submerged fermentation (SMF) and solid-state fermentation (SSF) techniques are currently being used to meet industrial demand for microbial cellulase production in the bio textile industry.
Results
Microbial cellulase is vital for increasing day to day due to its no side effect on the environment and human health becoming increasingly important. In conventional textile processing, the gray cloth was subjected to a series of chemical treatments that involved breaking the dye molecule’s amino group with Cl − , which started and accelerated dye(-resistant) bond cracking. A cellulase enzyme is primarily derived from a variety of microbial species found in various ecological settings as a biotextile/bio-based product technology for future needs in industrial applications.
Conclusion
Cellulase has been produced for its advantages in cellulose-based textiles, as well as for quality enhancement and fabric maintenance over traditional approaches. Cellulase’s role in the industry was microbial fermentation processes in textile processing which was chosen as an appropriate and environmentally sound solution for a long and healthy lifestyle.
Introduction
The textile industry has changed over time. In order to meet people’s demands, a variety of fibers have been manufactured with polyester, cotton, and viscose being the most popular (Felgueiras et al. 2021). The 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and 169 sub-targets included in the UN’s 2030 Agenda serve as a global benchmark for the shift to sustainability. The agenda recognizes the interconnectedness of various challenges, including poverty, health, industry, innovation, and infrastructure, clean water and sanitation, and environmental degradation, among others, and that they can only be addressed jointly (Weiland et al. 2021; Provin et al. 2021). A microbial enzyme isolated from natural ecosystems has unique properties that could make them good candidates for improving biomass conversion efficiency into value-added goods, chemicals, and fuels. However, research into the composition of cellulosic biomass and the natural sources of microbial enzymes that drive biomass conversion efficiency is still in its early stages (Haile and Ayele 2022; Mukherjee et al. 2022). Cellulosic biomass bioconversion based on biotechnology has the potential to be a long-term solution for the creation of new products with added value. Enzyme-based bioprocessing can reduce the unfavorable effect of fiber damage due to the precise reaction specificity given by enzymes for particular or targeted textile finishing. Enzyme bioprocessing has the potential to improve the performance and quality of the textile materials produced, as well as save water, energy, and chemicals (Nayak et al. 2021; Boodhoo et al. 2022; Bilal et al. 2022). Cellulases have been routinely used throughout cellulose-based materials for their advantages over traditional processes, as well as for quality enhancement and texture maintenance. Microbial cellulase is effective in replacing pumice stones in bio-stoning and removing excess color to give denim a soft, worn appearance (Vélez-Mercado et al. 2021; Perumal et al. 2022). Novozymes, DSM, DuPont, Amano Enzymes Inc., etc. are prominent players in cellulase enzyme production worldwide (Singh et al. 2021). Cellulase-based products like DeniMax® (Novozymes) and ValumaxA 838 have permitted an easy and cost-effective creation of new shades and finishes in the textile industry (Agrawal 2017; da Silva et al. 2021).
Also, microbes such as bacteria, fungus, and actinobacteria produce cellulolytic enzymes, which have a wide range of applications in agriculture, textiles, pulp and paper, food and beverage, brewing and winemaking, detergent manufacturing, and bioconversion for value-added industrial products (Kumar et al. 2022; Lin 2022; Shukor et al. 2022).
The aim of this review begins with an overview of cellulase, classification and structure, cellulase-producing microbes and diversity of cellulase-producing microbes are also addressed, as well as fermentative processes for microbial cellulase production, strain improvement of microbes for enhanced cellulase production, and numerous textile industrial applications of microbial cellulase.
Microbial cellulase-classification and structure
Many reserves of powders, bagasse, shells, brans, and residual cakes have all been used to improve the production of microbial cellulases from residual lignocellulosic biomass (Liu 2020). These residues are ubiquitous and sufficient in all parts of the world, and incinerating them, which is the most common processing method, affects ecosystems’ environmental quality. As a result, processing residual lignocellulosic biomass can be economically attractive for the bioproducts it can produce, in addition to being an appropriate environmental alternative (Luo et al. 2013; Roth et al. 2020). The most important strategy is the enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulosic biomass, which provides specificity, stereoselectivity, and greater conversion yields (Mumtaz et al. 2022; Wahart et al. 2022).
Microbial enzymes isolated from natural ecosystems have unique characteristics that could make them good candidates for improving biomass conversion efficiency into value-added products (Bussler et al. 2021). The term “cellulase” refers to all cellulolytic enzymes, systems, and structures, including cellulases produced by either cell-bound or extracellular microorganisms, as well as cellulase that differs in their mechanisms of action (Korsa et al. 2022; Mattam et al. 2022; Elsababty et al. 2022). The following types of cellulase have been described with their mechanisms of action and illustrated in Fig. 1; endoglucanase (EC 3.2.1.4) is a type of glucanohydrolase that cleaves glycoside linkages at random and binds to the noncrystalline component of cellulose, hydrolyzing amorphous sections more quickly due to weaker hydrogen bonds. It randomly breaks irregular cellulose chain sites, resulting in single polysaccharides or oligosaccharides of various lengths (Cremonesi and Casoli 2021; Berisio et al. 2022; de Souza et al. 2022). Exoglucanase (EC 3.2.1.91): 1, 4-β-D-glucan and cellobiohydrolases (I and II) are enzymes that bind and break elementary fibrils to create crystalline cellulose. It produces cello-oligosaccharides or disaccharides such as cellobiose or glucose by cleaving the ends of cellulose fibers (Islam and Roy 2018; Abuajah et al. 2022).
β-Glucosidase (EC 3.2.1.21): cleaves/hydrolyzes the disaccharide molecule cellobiose into simpler sugars and releases glucose monomers. From the nonreducing terminal glycosyl residues in cello-oligosaccharides, it cleaves cellobiose and other cello-oligomers into single sugars called glucose monomers (Saroj and Narasimhulu 2022; Raj et al. 2022).
The structures of cellulase (Linton 2020)
Cellulase-producing microbes
No one microorganism in nature can produce a comprehensive and balanced collection of enzymes capable of efficiently degrading all types of lignocellulosic biomass, as demonstrated (Chukwuma et al. 2021; Gomes et al. 2022) (Fig. 2). This is to be expected, given that plant biomass is destroyed by a complete community of organisms in the natural environment (in fact, developing a single organism capable of decomposing lignocelluloses into sugars alone is a major goal of consolidated bioprocessing).
The major cellulase-producing microorganisms modified from Leo et al. (2019)
As a result, several solutions for enhancing the industrial lignocellulose degradation process have been explored (Guan et al. 2022; Saravanan et al. 2022; Zainudin et al. 2022).
Microalgae, bacteria, and fungi create more extracellular cellulase, which helps to dissolve crystalline cellulose. Due to its immense biochemical diversity, the ability to generate bulk cultures, and the simplicity of genetic modification, enzymes released by these microorganisms are suitable for large-scale synthesis (Tapia-Tussell et al. 2020; Iram et al. 2022; Danso et al. 2022).
Diversity of cellulase-producing microbes
Microorganisms from a range of environmental environments have generated pathways for the creation of extracellular enzyme systems for the conversion of cellulosic substrates to simpler sugars and related products (Cheung and Vousden 2022). The decomposition of this cellulose material is discovered to be aided by cellulolytic microbes such as bacteria, actinomycetes, and fungi. Cellulolytic microorganism diversity and functions are generally influenced by soil structure and composition (Joshi et al. 2021; Greff et al. 2022; Tang et al. 2022). Since many enzyme-producing microorganisms are found in marine habitats, this environment is essential for exploring commercially useful enzymes (Vilela et al. 2021). For example, it has been found that forest soil has a higher number of cellulolytic microbes in comparison with agricultural, arid, garden soil, and compost (Tang et al. 2022). Cellulolytic microorganisms can be found in rotting grasses, leaves, and wood as well as in cotton bales, sewage sludge, silage, compost heaps, muds, decaying plant matter, and extreme environments like hot, acidified volcanic environments, and alkaline springs. They can also be found in soil, swamps, marshes, water bodies, and seawater sediments. They have also been associated with secondary microorganisms through symbiotic relationships (Wilson 2011; Leo et al. 2019; Kaur et al. 2020; Thapa et al. 2020). A number of seven bacterial isolates from the genera Ochrobactrum, Acinetobacter, Pseudoxanthomonas, Paenibacillus, Stenotrophomonas, and Comamonas were found in the composting leachate made from wheat straw (Mohammadipour et al. 2021). Three taxa of cellulolytic bacteria belonging to the families Aeromonas, Bacillus, and Exiguobacterium were isolated from sedimentary water samples of the lake (Chantarasiri 2021). In the Indo-Burma Biodiversity Hotspot, three cellulolytic fungi with significant FPase activity were isolated. Talaromyces verruculosus SGMNPf3 (KC937053), Trichoderma gamsii SGSPf7 (KC937055), and Trichoderma atroviride SGBMf4 were all characterized, identified, and reported to GenBank (KC937054) (Goyari et al. 2014). Also, microbial cellulases are produced by the green microalgae Chlamydomonas reinhardtii, Gonium pectoral and Volvox carteri (Guerriero et al. 2018).
Bacterial-producing cellulase
Cellulase-producing microorganisms distributed in the soil are broadly among many genera of a domain in the bacteria (Garcia et al. 2022). Enrichment of new microbial groups with high cellulase activity from uncultivated or forest soil is significant for the study of new species and functions that are relevant to fundamental concerns. Micromonospora, Acidothermus, Paenibacillus, Streptomyces, and Pseudomonas are examples of unique or new taxa of cellulolytic species that suggest that the ecosystem could be an attractive platform for the investigation of new enzymes for polysaccharide or cellulose degradation (Larson and Bagley 2022; Poulsen et al. 2022). Various bacteria could break down synthetic textile colors, such as azo dyes, triphenylmethane dyes, and anthraquinone dyes, have been researched. Bacterial degradation can be achieved using a single bacterial isolate or a consortium of microorganisms (Shukla et al. 2021).
As microbes secrete cellulose that is free of higher biopolymers, bacterial cellulose provides a low-cost feedstock (Kumar et al. 2019). Bacterial cellulose synthesis is a more cost-effective method of obtaining a quantity because microbial cellulose is pure and free of lignin, hemicelluloses, and pectin (Gedarawatte et al. 2021; Avcioglu 2022). Plant cellulose recovery is difficult and expensive due to the presence of nondegradable sources of polysaccharides of such components (Indumathi et al. 2022; Krishnaswamy et al. 2022). It is produced from coconut water by Gluconacetobacter (Acetobacter) xylinus for different applications (Singhania et al. 2022; Tureck et al. 2022). Bacterial cellulose is characterized by a three-dimensional structure made up of a superfine arrangement of cellulose nanofibers (3–8 nm). Their purity provides for successful application in biomedical products such as animal feeds, artificial cardiovascular tissues shown in (Table 1) below, and wound-covering scaffolds (Meng et al. 2019). The optimization of cellulase using bacterial species strain is used for the production of cellulase at the optimum condition of different parameters for industrial application (Gad et al. 2022; Montes et al. 2022).
Cellulase-producing fungi
Fungi are considered harmful microbes, although they are now an essential industrial raw material for a variety of applications (Bangar et al. 2022; Paul and Joshi 2022). It is possible that dynamic cellulose decomposers are to blame for the planet’s decomposition. Furthermore, the framework for the synthesis of cellulases by fungal cellulosomes was more desirable, since it was resistant to environmental changes. When compared to Aspergillus and Humicola species, Trichoderma species are considered the most appropriate species for cellulase synthesis and use in the industry (Mattam et al. 2022; Christopher et al. 2022).
However, genetically modified strains of Aspergillus can produce cellulase in a relatively higher amount (Singh et al. 2021). Over the years, various cellulolytic fungal spectrums have been collected and identified, and these numbers have continued to produce significant. An impressive assemblage of over 14,000 fungi that were active together with cellulose and added insoluble fibers were previously reported. Trichoderma viride and Trichoderma reesei, for example, support cellulase formation in suitable conditions, such as solid and submerged fermentation (Idris et al. 2017; Zhao et al. 2021). Fungal species are favored for cellulase synthesis because they release large volumes of extremely versatile extracellular cellulase (Monclaro et al. 2022; Lübeck and Lübeck 2022). By secreting a variety of hydrolytic and oxidative catalysts, fungal cellulases can hydrolyze lignocellulosic biomass. The best-characterized cellulolytic organisms are white-rot fungi, such as Phanerochaete chrysosporium, and soft-rot fungi, also including Fusarium solani, Penicillium funiculosum, Talaromyces emersonii, Trichoderma koningii, and Trichoderma reesei, as shown in Table 2 below. Aspergillus fumigatus, Aspergillus nidulans, Aspergillus aculeatus, Aspergillus niger, Aspergillus oryzae, and Aspergillus niger are the most widely used commercial microorganisms with high cellulolytic potential (Faheina Junior et al. 2022 et al. 2022; Isola et al. 2022; Santos et al. 2022; Vasco-Correa et al. 2022). A total of 88 filamentous fungal strains were identified, and cellulase-producing fungi screening revealed that 16 strains from the genera Penicillium, Trichoderma, Aspergillus, and Talaromyces had variable cellulolytic activity (Tomico-Cuenca et al. 2021; Lübeck and Lübeck 2022). Trichoderma harzianum isolate LZ117 is the most potent generator of these strains. A comparison of the transcriptomes of Trichoderma harzianum LZ117 and Trichoderma harzianum K223452, a control strain purified on cellulose, revealed a focused control of gene transcription essential to protein synthesis (Li et al. 2020; Pang et al. 2021; Mondal et al. 2022). Cellulase production optimization utilizing fungal species strains for the industry is critically shown in Table 2 below. Optimizing the parameters for cellulase production at the optimum condition of different parameters for industrial applications is critical (Gad et al. 2022; Helal et al. 2022).
Cellulase-producing actinomycetes
Actinomycetes are gram-positive mycelial microscopic organisms that are ubiquitous in soil and are particularly important for their role in the utilization of organic materials and the delivery of bioactive chemicals, with most isolates being indicated to do so (Al-Shaibani et al. 2021; Rani et al. 2021). A few studies suggested that separating actinomycetes from marine sediments could be useful for isolating novel actinomycetes with the potential to produce a useful new product. Actinomycetes, on the other hand, are known for producing a variety of extracellular enzymes that degrade polymers, including chitinase, lipase, and cellulase (Phuoc et al. 2020; Javed et al. 2021; Sudarshan et al. 2022). Actinomycetes have long been thought of as intermediate species between bacteria and fungi. They create a mycelial network of branching filaments, similar to fungi, but they are thinner, have muramic acid-containing cell walls, prokaryotic nuclei, and are susceptible to bactericidal antibiotics, just like bacteria (Gong et al. 2020). They are therefore real bacteria, despite their obvious fungal appearance. Mycobacteria and Corynebacteria are related to actinomycetes (Melgarejo et al. 2021; Streletskii et al 2022). They include the aerobic Nacardia, Actinomadura, Dermatophilus, and Streptomyces species, as well as the anaerobic Actinomyces, Arachnia, Bifidobacterium, and Rothia species. Actinomyces, the most common pathogenic genus, is anaerobic or microaerophilic and non-acid fast, whereas Nacardia species are aerobic and maybe acid fast (Viswanathan and Rebecca 2019; Patel et al. 2020; Subathra Devi et al. 2022).
Swarna and Gnanadoss. (2020) reported that Streptomyces sp. LCJ10A, Streptomyces sp. LCJ11A, Streptomyces sp. LCJ13A, Streptomyces sp. LCJ14A, and Streptomyces sp. LCJ16A identified from Pichavaram mangroves are indeed very efficient in producing economically important enzymes such as lipase, cellulase, and asparaginase. Such enzymes can be valuable resources for novel biotechnological processes and can contribute to the discovery of new biological understanding (Vijayakumar 2021; Abdel-Azeem et al. 2021; Sengupta et al. 2020) which was shown in (Table 3) below.
Actinomycetes that produce cellulase have been isolated and characterized as belonging to the following genera: Asanoa, Dactylosporangium, Kitasatospora, Nonomuraea, Streptomyces, and Streptosporangium (Putri and Setiawan 2019), Streptomyces and Nocardia (Meliani et al. 2022), and Streptomyces sp. MS-S2 (Danso et al. 2022). The optimization of cellulase using Actinomycetes species strain for the industry is of immense importance to optimize the parameters for cellulase production (Sivasankar et al. 2022; Sudarshan et al. 2022; Rodrigues et al. 2022) in Table 3.
Cellulase-producing archaea
In-depth studies have been carried out on the structure and development of the methanogenic archaeal species that participate in the biomass-degrading microbial communities found in biogas plants (Maus et al. 2018). The majority of the Archaea cellulase observed comes from intensive surroundings. Certain cellulase genes were identified in Desulfurococcus fermentans and Thermogladius cellulolyticus, whereas hyperthermophilic Archaea include Pyrococcus furiosus, Pyrococcus horikoshii, and Sulfolobus solfataricus (Graham et al. 2011; Leo et al. 2019; Larson and Bagley 2022; Kabaivanova et al. 2022). Maus et al. (2017) studied that the hydrogenotrophic route, which represents the final phase of the anaerobic digestion (AD) chain, was anticipated to create CH4 by seven of the examined methanogenic Archaea. Two species, Methanoculleus bourgensis and Defuviito gatunisiensis, were found to have a dominant role in biogas microbial communities among the microorganisms investigated (Camargo et al. 2021; Malik and Furtado 2022; Jo et al. 2022). Das et al. (2019) studied the characterization of extremely halophilic archaeal isolates from Indian salt pans, and screening for hydrolytic enzyme production Halophilic archaea is multi-stress-tolerant organisms, and their catalysts are of specific importance because they are generally stable and functional under extreme temperatures and low water activity. Because of their improved functionality in extreme circumstances encountered in numerous industries, the search for novel extremozymes is continuing. Haloferax, Halorubrum, Halococcus, Haloarcula, Halogeometricum, and Haloterrigena were among the six genera studied (Junior et al. 2022; Leoni et al. 2022).
Cellulase-producing microalgae
Microalgae are microscopic organisms that contain chlorophyll and are found in freshwater and marine habitats (Shokrkar and Keighobadi 2022; Melendez et al. 2022). Cellulase is produced by the microalgae Chlorella homosphaera, Nannochloropsis sp., Rhizoclonium sp., Chlorococcum infusionum, Haematococcus pluvialis, Chlorella sp., and Scenedesmus sp (Zuorro et al. 2016; Sharma and Yazdani 2016). Because of its high abundance of vital nutrients and minerals, microalgal biomass has gained a lot of interest in the industrial world. Low biomass production, an uneven carbon-to-nitrogen (C/N) ratio, refractory cellular components, and the high cost of microalgal harvesting are all key roadblocks to algal biomass valorization (Shah and Mishra 2020; Tawfik et al. 2022).
Fermentative processes for microbial cellulase production
Today, industrial demand for microbial production of cellulase is being met by production methods using submerged fermentation (SMF) processes and solid-state fermentation (SSF). Cellulolytic microorganisms are known as true cellulolytic microorganisms, which can degrade natural cellulose (Faheina Junior et al. 2022 et al. 2022; Santos et al. 2022). Microbial enzymes that dominate commercial applications due to their high levels of expression and secretion can create free cellulases. Solid-state fermentation (SSF) and submerged fermentation (SMF) are the two basic techniques for producing cellulases, and they differ in terms of environmental conditions and modes of conduction (El Sheikha and Ray 2022; Nascimento et al. 2022; Chmelová et al. 2022). Verifiable analysis of the volume of water present in the reaction is one of the most important characteristics in separating these types of cycles. Water activity to support cell growth and metabolism, on the other hand, does not approach the water’s maximum binding capacity with a solid matrix (Teles et al. 2019; Nisar et al. 2022; Kalogeropoulou et al. 2022).
Submerged fermentation (SMF)
Industrially important enzymes have traditionally been obtained from submerged fermentation (SMF) because of the case of handling and greater control of environmental factors such as temperature and pH (Oh and Jin 2020; Mitri et al. 2022; Intasit et al. 2022). Because of the consumption and high cost of enzymes, submerged fermentation currently produces commercial enzymes, and several of the possible uses have been industrialized. When compared to SSF, SMF offers better control of environmental characteristics, lower labor costs, fewer space requirements, and lower scale-up requirements (Libardi et al. 2019). Ramamoorthy et al. (2019) reported that when utilizing an SMF to make cellulase, the following issues are frequently encountered: the production of cellulase causes an increase in the viscosity of the culture broth. Enhanced agitation to counteract it may result in uncontrollable foaming, secreted cellulase within the culture broth may cause partial saccharification (of the lignocellulosic biomass) and concentration of sugars (glucose and xylose), a lower dissolved oxygen percent (DO%) in the broth due to the growing fungus’s accelerated uptake of oxygen, and a decreased oxygen hold up due to an increase in the viscosity (Hosseini et al. 2022; Kabatesi and Wang 2022).
In the submerged fermentation, extracellular endoglucanase activity was also detected, and the four strains had similar enzyme excretion patterns. The extracellular activity was lowest in the Klebsiella sp. (B2) strain, albeit this difference was not significant when compared to the other strains. In Petri dishes, the results were found to be consistent with CMC growth patterns and enzymatic hydrolysis profiles (Barbosa et al. 2020; Kurt and Cekmecelioglu 2021).
Solid-state fermentation (SSF)
Solid-state fermentation relies on the utilization of less expensive substrates for cellulase synthesis, making it more cost-effective (Dessie et al. 2022; Chilakamarry et al. 2022). The technology is promising because of the high product concentration, low dewatering costs, and low infrastructure and expertise requirements. Solid-state fermentation offers higher cellulase yields than submerged fermentation, and production costs are decreased significantly with the right technology, improved bioreactor design, and a competitive cellulase production process. The ingredients of the medium also influence the synthesis of enzymes by different bacteria (Kieliszek et al. 2021; Nabot et al. 2022). For the production of microbial metabolites, solid-state fermentation used complex substrates such as sugarcane bagasse, wheat bran, wheat straw, rice bran, rice straw, corncobs, banana waste, wheat flour, cornflour, mustard oil cake, sesame oil cake, cotton oil cake, cassava flour, steamed rice, sayo hulls, sago humps, and apple pomance (El Sheikha and Ray; 2022; Santos et al. 2022). For example, the filamentous fungus Trichoderma reesei RUT C30 was used for cellulase production using wheat bran as substrate under SSF (Singhania et al. 2007). SSF methods are mostly employed for enzyme production as this process is very simple and cost-effective (Bala and Singh 2019; Siqueira et al. 2020). The temperature maintenance, pH maintenance, moisture maintenance, lack of homogeneous mass transfer, uneven fungal growth in the SSF media, and lack of a methodology to estimate the exact fungal biomass concentration are all problems with scaling up SSF in an industrial application (Ramamoorthy et al. 2019; Pandey and Negi 2020; Prabhu et al. 2022).
Strain improvement of microbes for enhanced cellulase production
Strain improvement is inevitable if cellulase production has to be reached an industrially feasible level. Engineering cellulases to improve their properties to meet robust industrial applications is often required (Dey et al. 2021; Ugbenyen and Ikhimalo 2021; Adnan et al. 2022). Filamentous fungi natively secrete various cellulases when growing on lignocellulose wastes. Improving cellulase expression by random mutagenesis is the classical approach. Random mutagenesis, site-specific mutagenesis, or their combinations have been used to obtain tailor-made enzymes for industrial applications (Bhati and Sharma 2021; Jeennor et al. 2022). Improved cellulase production from Aureobasidium pullulans Y-2311–1, thanks to genome shuffling and bacteria. On day 1, one strain produced through genome shuffling (Aureobasidium pullulans GS23) had the highest overall cellulase activity, which was sixfold higher than the wild-type strain. In comparison with the wild-type strain, the Aureobasidium pullulans GS23 strain reported a 6.95-fold and 1.52-fold increase in exoglucanase and b-glucosidase activity, respectively (Baldwin et al. 2020). Understanding the whole-genome sequence and functions makes determining the target regions for genetic changes much easier. Targeted strain engineering, whether for better cellulase production in fungi or metabolic engineering, necessitates effective ways of introducing controlled genetic changes into an organism (Jiao et al. 2021; Olukunle et al. 2021).
For a long time, the low effectiveness of gene targeting has made obtaining a reasonable number of transformants by homologous integration or deletion of the expression cassette a considerable difficulty. Because of their ability to grow on the less expensive substrate, they had become prospective sources of metabolites for industrial use. Years of research and industrial use have gathered knowledge about fungal genetics (Papzan et al. 2021; Poonsrisawat et al. 2022). Engineering CBDs (cellulose-binding domains) of cellulases, molecular cloning, and gene expression were used to boost cellulase activity (Sharma et al. 2022; Calzada et al. 2021). A novel approach for enhancing catalytic activity is to use a new technique called substrate-induced gene-expression screening (SIGEX) in conjunction with fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS). Through bacterial mutagenesis, cellulase activity in cellulase-producing thermophiles was also increased. For example, Bacillus sp. strain C1 was mutagenically treated with NTG (N-methyl-N′-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine), and altered clones were obtained (Singhania et al. 2021). The cost of the cellulase enzyme and its stability are the two most important considerations in its application. Cotton preparations, wool, and dyeing treatment all require cellulases. Novel cellulases with higher process compatibility, high specific activity, better specificity, and stability are being identified from new lineages of cellulolytic organisms due to their broad uses and ever-increasing demand (Adebami and Adebayo-Tayo 2020; Srivastava et al. 2022). Because of its effectiveness, strain enhancement for cellulase production using mutagenesis agents has gotten a lot of interest. UV, X-rays, gamma radiation, ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS), N-methyl-N-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine (NTG), and mustards have all been used as mutagenic agents (Sangkharak et al. 2012; Faheina Junior et al. 2022 et al. 2022). Lu et al. (2020) studied, based on phylogenetic position and phenotypic characteristics, the high-yield bacteria cellulase-producing strain Komagataeibacter sp. nov. CGMCC 17,276 was assigned as a novel species in the Komagataeibacter genus with good properties of rapid cell growth and high bacterial cellulase production. Under static and agitated conditions, properties analysis of bacterial cellulose generated by Komagataeibacter sp. nov. CGMCC 17,276 revealed strongly cross-linked cellulose nanomaterial (Betlej et al. 2021).
Ryngajłło et al. (2020) reported that a recombinant strain of Komagataeibacter xylinus 10,245 was produced for the composite synthesis of bacterial cellulose and chitin. In Komagataeibacter xylinus, an operon including three Candida albicans UDP-GlcNAc synthesis genes (AGM1, NAG5, and UAP1) was expressed under the control of a promoter. The modified strain was able to produce activated cytoplasmic UDPGlcNAc monomers that cellulose synthase could use to join glucose and GlcNAc to form a chimeric polymer. To boost transformation efficiency, pyr4 deletion in the fungus Trichoderma reesei SN1 was used to create a pyr4 Disruption Strain from a uracil auxotroph strain, SP4 (Saravanakumar et al. 2020; Zheng et al. 2020). The glucose output of SPB2 is 65.0% higher than that of SP4 when corncob residues are saccharified with crude enzyme (Fierro et al. 2022; Rosolen et al. 2022).
These results reveal the feasibility of strain improvement through the development of an efficient genetic transformation platform to construct a balanced cellulase system for biomass conversion (Qian et al. 2016). After UV irradiation and NTG treatment, Cellulomonas sp. strain M23, a significant strain that produces a high amount of cellulase, was selected from 328 mutant strains to boost cellulase production from Cellulomonas sp TSU-03 (Kothari et al. 2019; Yanagisawa et al. 2022). In comparison with the wild type, the maximum value of cellulase activity 2008 U/mg protein was attained, as well as a significant potential for cellulase production by fermentation using a growth medium containing carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) as the major substrate (Sangkharak et al. 2012). Sadhu et al. (2013) studied that after mutagenesis with N-methyl-N′-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine (NTG) as a mutagenic agent, a putative mutant (C1M26) of Bacillus sp. (MTCC10046) was screened from the wild C1 strain. In comparison with the wild-type C1 strain, the mutant C1M26 generated more cellulase. These results in increased cellulase synthesis due to regulatory gene mutations or cellulase mRNA stability. Sequential mutagenesis with three mutagens of ultraviolet irradiation (UV), N-methyl-N′-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine (NTG), and ethyl methanesulfonate improved the activity of Streptomyces durhamensis (EMS) (Golinska et al. 2020; Lakshmi et al. 2020; Azouz 2021). The cellulase activity of the mutant Streptomyces durhamensis GC23 was improved to 1.86-fold compared to the wild strain (vs15) after mutagenesis, and the cellulase activity of the mutant Streptomyces durhamensis GC23 was further optimized to twofold that of the wild type (Lakshmi et al. 2020).
Application of microbial cellulase for textile industries
Cellulases are a type of hydrolase that can degrade lignocelluloses. They are widely applied in numerous sectors because they are made from renewable resources and waste. They have a wide range of uses in textiles, detergents, and other biotechnology fields, with a recent concentration on the textile industry (Ejaz et al. 2021). Denim washing with cellulase is a common eco-friendly procedure for achieving a pleasing look and non-abrasiveness in cotton textures and denim. However, previous enzymatic denim washing methods used acid cellulase (Trichoderma reesei) and neutral cellulase (Humicola isolens), both of which had the problem of causing indigo color back staining on the cloth. Although it has been suggested that pH is the most important factor in preventing back stains, there have been no reports on the use of cellulase for denim washing under soluble circumstances. Under basic conditions, a soluble base stable endoglucanase from alkalothermophilic Thermomonospora sp. (T-EG) was used for denim finishing (Imran et al. 2019; Sampathkumar et al. 2019). The textile industry meets one of humanity’s most fundamental necessities while also contributing significantly to many country’s economic growth. The demand for textile materials is increasing as the population grows and per capita consumption of textiles rises (Ahmed and Bibi 2018; Provin et al. 2021; Skiba et al. 2022). The traditional method of textile wet processing, on the other hand, involves a series of steps before it leads to a finished fabric, which requires the use of high salt concentrations, harsh chemicals, and a large amount of water and energy consumption, all of which are critiqued due to their environmental cost. The employment of enzymes in textile wet processing is guided by an understanding of the environment (Son et al. 2022; Ambaye et al. 2022). Enzymes introduce biotechnology into the textile industries, which appears to strike a reasonable compromise between industrial demands and environmentally responsible product development (Aggarwal et al. 2020; Singhania et al. 2022). It is important to note that recent technological breakthroughs in the field of bio-based processing have resulted in significant changes in the textile industry, which is increasingly becoming more ecologically conscious (Fasiku et al. 2020; Nursyirwani et al. 2020; Kabir and Koh 2021). Resizing, scouring, dyeing, coloring, and finishing are five key applications of textile wet processing, as illustrated in Fig. 3. However, the most common enzyme-based industrial processes, such as biodesizing, bioscouring, and biobleaching, have experienced industrial biotechnological breakthroughs and now outperform the efficacy and effectiveness of chemical-based processing for wet textile preparatory processes (Rahman et al. 2020; Rajulapati et al. 2020).
Biostone washing
One of the most important aspects of producing a faded look is denim washing. Previously, stone washing was done by providing it with a soft feel and the desired appearance. The pumice stone removes color particles from the yarn surface in the denim fabric after washing. The faded effect is obtained by ring dyeing denim fabric and heavy abrasion during the stone washing process (Mazotto et al. 2021; Periyasamy and Tehrani-Bagha 2022). To achieve the fading effects, oxidative bleaching chemicals with or without the inclusion of stones have also been used. Denim washing is one of the key areas in getting a faded look. Earlier stone washing is used to be done to achieve a soft feel and the desired appearance. During washing, the pumice stone, and scraps of the dye particles from the yarn surface in the denim fabric. Due to the ring dyeing of denim fabric and heavy abrasion during the stone washing process, the faded effect is achieved. Oxidative bleaching agents with or without the addition of stones have also been used to get the fading effects (Costa et al. 2021; Mustafa et al. 2022). Denim, which is made of twill weave fabric colored in indigo colors and has a well-worn appearance, has gained a lot of favor over the years. The traditional use of pumice stones (with or without an oxidizing agent such as potassium permanganate) for stone washing denim has some drawbacks (Korsa et al. 2022), including machine damage, drainage system blockage, issues with residue removal on the pumice stones, the need for a large number of stones for even small batches, and the risk of excessive abrasion damaging the fabric. Over the years, denim-heavy-grade cotton twill, dyed with indigo colors and a well-worn look, has churned commendable popularity. The conventional use of pumice stones (with or without oxidizing agent like potassium permanganate) for “stone washing” of denim suffers from numerous practical snags including impairment of machine parts, blockage of the drainage system, issues of removal of residues on the pumice stones, requisite for a large number of stones for even small batches, and the possibility of excessive abrasion that may damage the fabric (Bağıran et al. 2021; Hasan et al. 2021; Islam 2021).
Among others, cellulases have received considerable interest in the textile industry for mercerization, scouring, bio-polishing, laundering, and “stone” finishing (Korsa et al. 2022). Periyasamy and Venkatesan (2019) reviewed that the indigo dye on the denim surface is loosened by the cellulase, which is referred to as “biostoning.” Several pumice stones can be replaced by a tiny quantity of enzymes, making handling easier. The biostoning procedure decreases denim fabric degradation, processing machinery wear, and pumice dust production (Rahman et al. 2020; Eid and Ibrahim 2021; Pandit et al. 2022). During the process, a pumice stone can lose up to 50% of its weight and produce a large amount of pumice grit, which can result in pumice sludge. The use of enzymes instead of pumice stones is environmentally friendly (Eid and Ibrahim 2021; Hoque et al. 2021; Mevada et al. 2022). Pazarlioğlu et al. (2005) reported that back staining and tissue stiffness have previously limited the use of acid cellulases, such as those produced by Trichoderma, in biostoning, and anti-redeposition chemicals or bleaching agents have been employed to counteract this during washing phases. Neutral cellulases, on the other hand, have a less aggressive effect. Another widely used application of enzymes in the finishing of textile products (cotton and other cellulose-based fibers) is biopolishing. The indigo dye is on the fabric’s surface, and cellulases remove the surface fibers to reveal the white string (Aggarwal et al. 2019; Islam 2021; Arbab et al. 2022). Rashid and Rahman (2020) studied that due to its great differences and attractive color look, acid wash on denim jeans is becoming increasingly fashionable. Clothes with an indigo or sulfur base can be washed in acid. Tumbling denim garments with pumice stones presoaked in a solution containing sodium hypochlorite (5 to 10%) or potassium permanganate is the most common method of acid washing (3 to 6%).
Biopolishing and finishing
Cellulases act on small-fiber ends that protrude from the fabric surface in biopolishing, where mechanical action removes these fibers and polishes the fabrics, resulting in a smooth glossy appearance with improved color brightness, hydrophilicity, and moisture absorbance, an environmentally friendly process, and uniformly improved finishing (de Souza Lima et al. 2022; Gupta and Kelkar-Mane 2022). Trichoderma reesei’s endoglucanase II is thought to be the most effective enzyme for finishing cotton fabrics and biostoning denim garments. However, during finishing and biostoning, commercially available endoglucanase II is frequently blended with other cellulase components, particularly endoglucanase I, resulting in hydrolysis and weight loss of garments (Kinet et al. 2015; Pandit et al. 2022). To eliminate the presence of additional cellulose components, we extracted the endoglucanase II gene from Trichoderma reesei and expressed it in Pichia pastoris under the control of a methanol-inducible AOX1 promoter. When the endoglucanase II gene of Trichoderma reesei is heterologously produced in Pichia pastoris, it produces an enzyme that does not cause cellulosic fiber weight loss when used in denim washes (Amengual et al. 2022; Saif et al. 2022) and biopolishing, a great improvement over the use of commercially available Trichoderma reesei cellulase (Rather et al. 2022; Khan et al. 2022; Sivasankar et al. 2022).
Bioscouring
The scouring method of today is chemically based and incredibly alkaline. Chemical procedures are unspecific; thus, they attack not just the contaminants but also the cellulose, causing harm to the strength qualities. Furthermore, due to high COD, BOD, and TDS levels in the effluents, present procedures are harmful to the environment. In the last 10–12 years, a wide range of studies on cotton bio-preparation have been performed (Chavan et al. 2020; Sen et al. 2021; Laga 2022). Bioscouring, an environmentally friendly way of eliminating impurities from fabrics using enzymes, is one of the alternative processes that has been studied in recent years to improve scouring efficiency while lowering ecological impact. The conventional scouring method, which uses a harsh environment, is gradually being replaced by an enzyme-based method that is more environmentally friendly (Jagajanantha et al. 2022; Sharma et al. 2022). Bioscouring is a wettability-boosting method in which enzymes remove non-cellulosic sticky molecules from a piece of fabric without destroying its cellulose content, such as pectin, natural waxes, esters, grease, dirt, and oil. Bioscouring is a process in which enzymes remove non-cellulosic viscous compounds from a piece of fabric without degrading its cellulose content, such as pectin, natural waxes, esters, grease, dirt, oil, and so on, to boost the fabric’s wettability (Jagajanantha et al. 2022; Pandit et al. 2022). Degumming and scouring have traditionally been done in alkaline and high-temperature environments (pH 10 and 95 °C). This requires rigorous treatment of alkali-containing effluent after the process, which consumes a lot of energy and damages fibers. This results in poor fabric quality and stability, as well as a labor-intensive and costly process. Toxic effluents are produced during chemical treatment, which is hazardous to the environment and also damages the fabric material (Al-Dhabi et al. 2020; Rajulapati et al. 2020). High heterologous expression of an alkaline pectate lyase (APL) as a key enzyme is used in mild bioscouring pretreatment processes with reduced environmental pollution and energy consumption, whereas traditional chemical treatment methods are carried out under high pH and temperature conditions with high-energy and effluent treatment costs, particularly in the textile industry (Radhakrishnan 2022; Tatta et al. 2022). However, due to the slim profits of the textile industry, the production cost of APL restricts its application in the bio-textile industry (De Oliveira et al. 2021; Nguyen et al. 2021a, b; Ramesh et al. 2021).
Due to their high price, APLs produced by Bacillus subtilis, Pichia pastoris, or Aspergillus niger now on the market are mainly food grade for use in food and fodder and were not suited for the bio-treatment of textiles. As a result, it is critical to raise APL’s fermentation output and lower production costs to optimize its applicability for the bio-treatment of textiles (Singh et al. 2020; Zhen et al. 2020).
Biocarbonization and wool scouring
The dyeing of wool with suitable dyes usually necessitates an acidic bath, the pH of which is determined by the dyestuff levelling qualities. It is well established that using low pH values results in improved dye exhaustion (greater dye uptake). However, in terms of the excellent performance and quality of wool goods, the reliance on levelling qualities on pH is equally crucial (Gouveia et al. 2008; El-Sayed et al. 2021). Wool carbonization, a procedure that uses sulfuric acid to remove plant residues from wool, has unfavorable environmental and wool quality consequences. Enzymatic treatment of wool with cellulases and pectinases may increase the decomposition of vegetable matter, allowing it to be easily removed and reducing the amount of sulfuric acid required for the carbonizing process (Chowdhury and Pandit 2022). Wool scouring is an essential part of the manufacturing process that removes contaminants from raw wool such as wool greases, detergents, dirt, and other impurities (Awchat 2022; Chowdhury and Pandit 2022).
Because of the tightening of environmental standards, the cost of effluent treatment and sludge disposal generated during the traditional scouring process utilizing an aqueous solution or solvents is becoming a growing concern for the textile industry (El-Newashy et al. 2021; Kaur and Verma 2021). In wool scouring, enzymes such as xylanase, pectinase, savinase, and resinase can be used to improve process efficiency and reduce water consumption and scouring effluents (Maiti et al. 2018; Sharma et al. 2022).
Defibrillation of lyocell
Surface fibrils released during fibrillation treatment are removed during the enzyme treatment of the fibrillated lyocell fabric. Because of the specific hydrolysis that occurs during enzymatic treatment, the mechanical characteristics are degraded more quickly. The enzyme treatment can affect all of the fibers in the fabric, whereas the mechanical defibrillation treatment affects only the surface fibers (Ibbett et al. 2013; Berto et al. 2021; Mazotto et al. 2021).
Lyocell fibers were exposed to different doses of a cross-linking substance to investigate the fibrillation propensity.
An ideal concentration was discovered to minimize fibrillation. Held to account was the influence of physical parameters on the fibrillation index. Birefringence, inherent viscosity, and relative crystallinity are among them (Rahman et al. 2021; Abbasi Moud 2022).
A large degree of irregular superficial fibrillation can be found in lyocell fabric. There are no quantifiable modifications in linear density or fiber diameter since the underlying fibers that make up the majority of the fabric are unaffected by the mechanical treatment (Zhang et al. 2018; Artigas-Arnaudas et al. 2022).
Fabrics made from cellulosic fibers such as cotton, viscose, ramie, linen, and lyocell (lyocell is a pure cellulosic fiber made from wood pulp that shows fibrillation on the surface after being solvent spun with amino oxide) were used. These fibers tended to generate “fuzz” (short fibers protruding from the surface) and “pilling” (fluffy/loosened fuzz adhered to the surface), both of which were regarded as unfavorable characteristics of cellulosic fabrics (Hildebrandt et al. 2021; Tian et al. 2022).
Conclusion
The biological aspects of cellulosic biomass processing will be the focus of future cellulase and cellulolytic microbe research. The use of cellulase at appropriate levels for the purpose has various advantages, including being ecologically friendly, causing less damage to clothes without sacrificing fabric strength, reducing equipment wear, increasing garment load in the machine, and improving garment quality. The various cellulases are expected to attack the cellulosic fibers’ surface (representing bundles of fibrils), then attach to the exposed fibrils on the yarn surface, and hydrolyze the latter, leaving the fiber core intact. The release of the surface-adhered dye is enhanced by mechanical action as a result of controllable/tunable hydrolysis of the fiber surface. Enzyme-based textile processing is cost-effective, environmentally benign, non-hazardous, and uses little water. In cellulose-based textiles, cellulases have been extensively recognized for their advantages over traditional processes, as well as for quality enhancement and fabric maintenance. Microorganisms’ cellulases are effective in replacing pumice stones for bio-stoning and removing excess color from denim to give it softness and a worn appearance. Finding innovative cellulolytic enzymes with higher functioning necessitates the use of cutting-edge technologies.
Availability of data and materials
The datasets used or analyzed during the preparation of the review manuscript are available from the corresponding author at reasonable request.
Abbreviations
- AD:
-
Anaerobic digestion
- CBD:
-
Cellulose-binding domains
- NTG:
-
N-Methyl-N′-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine
- SIGEX:
-
Substrate-induced gene-expression screening
- SMF:
-
Submerged fermentation
- SSF:
-
Solid-state fermentation
References
Abbasi Moud A (2022) Chiral liquid crystalline properties of cellulose nanocrystals: fundamentals and applications. ACS Omega 7(35):30673–30699. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1021/acsomega.2c03311
Abdel-Azeem AM, Abu-Elsaoud AM, Abo Nahas HH, Abdel-Azeem MA, Balbool BA, Mousa MK, Darwish, AM (2021) Biodiversity and industrial applications of genus Chaetomium. Indust Import Fung Sustain Dev 147–206. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/978-3-030-67561-5_5 Springer, Cham
Abou-Dobara MI, El-Sayed AK, El-Fallal AA, Sauf MA (2015) Cellulase production by two Streptomyces species. J Scient Damien Faculty Sci 5:24–32. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.21608/sjdfs.2015.194460
Abuajah CI, Ogbonna AC, Chukeze EJ, Ikpeme CA, Asogwa KK (2022) A glucose oxidase peroxidase-coupled continuous assay protocol for the determination of cellulase activity in the laboratory the Abuajah method. Anal Biochem 114649. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.ab.2022.114649
Acharya PB, Acharya DK, Modi HA (2008) Optimization for cellulase production by Aspergillus niger using saw dust as substrate. Afr J Biotechnol 7:4147–4152. http://www.academicjournals.org/AJB
Adebami GE, Adebayo-Tayo BC (2020) Development of cellulolytic strain by genetic engineering approach for enhanced cellulase production. Gen Met Eng Impr Biofuel Prod Lignocell Biomas 103–136. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/b978-0-12-817953-6.00008-7 Amsterdam: Elsevier
Adnan M, Ma X, Olsson S, Wang J, Liu G (2022) Promoter regulation and genetic engineering strategies for enhanced cellulase expression in Trichoderma reesei. Microbiol Res 127011. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.micres.2022.127011
Afzal M, Qureshi MZ, Khan S, Khan MI, Ikram H, Ashraf A, Iqbal A, Qureshi NA (2019). Production, purification and optimization of cellulase by Bacillus licheniformis HI-08 isolated from the hindgut of wood-feeding termite. Int J Agr Biol 21:125-34. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.17957/IJAB/15.0872
Aggarwal R, Dutta T, Sheikh J (2019) Extraction of amylase from the microorganism isolated from textile mill effluent vis a vis desizing of cotton. Sustain Chem Pharm 14:100178. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.scp.2019.100178
Aggarwal R, Dutta T, Sheikh J (2020) Extraction of pectinase from Candida isolated from textile mill effluent and its application in bio-scouring of cotton. Sust Sustain Chem Pharm 17:100291. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.scp.2020.100291
Agrawal BJ (2017) Biostoning of denim an environmentally friendly approach. Cur Trend Biomed Eng Biosci 3:45–47. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.19080/CTBEB.2017.03.555612
Ahmed A, Bibi A. (2018). Fungal cellulase; production and applications: minireview. Int J Health Life Sci 4:19–36. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.20319/lijhls.2018.41.1936
Akinyele HA, Taliat AAT, Enwerem GC, Daodu OG, Owojuyigbe OS. (2020). Lignocellulosic waste degradation potential of some cellulolytic fungal strains isolated from putrid fruits. J Pure Appl Microbiol 14:258593. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.22207/JPAM.14.4.34
Al-Dhabi NA, Esmail GA, Ghilan AKM, Arasu MV, Duraipandiyan V, Ponmurugan K (2020) Characterization and fermentation optimization of novel thermo stable alkaline protease from Streptomyces sp. Al-Dhabi-82 from the Saudi Arabian environment for eco-friendly and industrial applications. J King Saud Univer Sci 32:1258-1264. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.jksus.2019.11.011
Al-Shaibani MM, Radin Mohamed RMS, Sidik NM, Enshasy HAE, Al-Gheethi A, Noman E, Zin NM (2021) Biodiversity of secondary metabolites compounds isolated from phylum actinobacteria and its therapeutic applications. Molecules 26:4504. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3390/molecules26154504
Ambaye TG, Vaccari M, Prasad S, van Hullebusch ED, Rtimi S (2022) Preparation and applications of chitosan and cellulose composite materials. J Environ Mgt 301:113850. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113850
Amengual NG, Csarman F, Wohlschlager L, Ludwig R (2022) Expression and characterization of a family 45 glycosyl hydrolase from Fomitopsis pinicola and comparison to Phanerochaete chrysosporium Cel45A. Enzyme Microb Technol 156:110000. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.enzmictec.2022.110000
Arbab S, Ullah H, Khan MI, Khattak MN, Zhang J, Li K, Hassan IU (2022) Diversity and distribution of thermophilic microorganisms and their applications in biotechnology. J Basic Microbiol 62:95–108. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1002/jobm.202100529
Artigas-Arnaudas J, Muñoz BK, Sánchez M, de Prado J, Utrilla M, Ureña A (2022) Surface modifications of carbon fiber electrodes for structural supercapacitors. Appl Compos Mater 29:889–900. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/s10443-021-09998-5
Avcioglu NH (2022) Bacterial cellulose: recent progress in production and industrial applications. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 38:1–13. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/s11274-022-03271-y
Awchat GD (2022) Upgradation of wool scouring plant for efficient wastewater treatment. Ecol Eng Environ Technol 23(1). https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.12912/27197050/142937
Azouz R (2021). Bottom-up approach through microbial green biosynthesis of nanoparticles from waste. Wast Recycl Technol Nanomater Manufact 671–697. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/978-3-030-68031-2_23. Springer, Cham
Bağıran C, Körlü A, Yapar S (2021) Wastewater treatment of a denim washing plant by using waste pumice stones to recycle wastewater and reuse. Sustain Text Fash Value Chain 151–168. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/978-3-030-22018-1_9 Springer, Cham
Bala A, Singh B (2019) Cellulolytic and xylanolytic enzymes of thermophiles for the production of renewable biofuels. Ren Ener 136:1231–1244. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.renene.2018.09.100
Baldwin EL, Karki B, Johnson TJ, Zahler JD, Gibbons J, Gibbons WR (2020) Enhancing cellulase production in Aureobasidium pullulans by genome shuffling. Indust Biotechnol 16:247–255. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1089/ind.2018.0011
Bangar SP, Suri S, Trif M, Ozogul F (2022) Organic acids production from lactic acid bacteria: apreservation approach. Food Biosci 46:101615. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.fbio.2022.101615
Barbosa KL, dos Santos MVR, Machado SS, Junior GAL, da Silva APV, Almeida RMRG, da Luz JMR (2020) Bacterial cellulase from the intestinal tract of the sugarcane borer. Int J Biol Macro 161:441–444. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.06.042
Berisio R, Barra G, Romano M, Squeglia F, Ruggiero A (2022) Structural and biochemical characterization of endo-β-1, 4-glucanase from Dictyoglomus thermophilum, a hyperthermostable and halotolerant cellulase. Catalyst 12(3):302. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3390/catal12030302
Berto GL, Mattos BD, Rojas OJ, Arantes V (2021) Single-step fiber pretreatment with monocomponent endoglucanase: defibrillation energy and cellulose nanofibril quality. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 9(5):2260–2270. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1021/acssuschemeng.0c08162
Betlej I, Zakaria S, Krajewski KJ, Boruszewski P (2021). Bacterial cellulose properties and its potential application. Sain Malay 50: 493–505. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.17576/jsm-2021-5002-20
Bhati N, Sharma AK (2021) Cost-effective cellulase production, improvement strategies, and future challenges. J Food Proc Eng 44(2):e13623. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1111/jfpe.13623
Biernat K (2019) Elements of bioeconomy. Overv Proc Enzy Transform Biomass https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.5772/intechopen.78099 (Chapter 4):1-30. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.5772/intechopen.88966
Bilal M, Lam SS, Iqbal HM (2022) Biocatalytic remediation of pharmaceutically active micropollutants for environmental sustainability. Environ Pol 293:118582. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.envpol.2021.118582
Boodhoo KVK, Flickinger MC, Woodley JM, Emanuelsson EAC (2022) Bioprocess intensification: a route to efficient and sustainable biocatalytic transformations for the future. Chem Eng Process Proc Intensif 108793. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.cep.2022.108793
Budihal SR, Agsar D, Patil SR (2016) Enhanced production and application of acidothermophilic Streptomyces cellulase. Biores Technol 200:706–712. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.biortech.2015.10.098
Bussler L, Jacomini D, Corrêa JM, Kadowaki MK, Maller A, Simão RDCG (2021) Recombinant cellulase of Caulobacter crescentus: potential applications for biofuels and textile industries. Cell 28(5):2813–2832. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/s10570-021-03700-5
Calzada MST, Contreras JAR, Lerma JBP, Cruz NOS, Miranda JLO (2021) Production of truncated peptide (cellobiohydrolase Cel6A) by Trichoderma reesei expressed in Escherichia coli. Afr j Biotechnol 20(5):186–193. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.5897/AJB2020.17282
Camargo FP, Sakamoto IK, Duarte ICS, Silva EL, Varesche MBA (2021) Metataxonomic characterization of the bacterial and archaeal community involved in hydrogen and methane production from citrus peel waste (Citrus sinensis L Osbeck) in batch reactors. Biomas Bioenerg 149:106091. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.biombioe.2021.106091
Chantarasiri A (2021) Diversity and activity of aquatic cellulolytic bacteria isolated from sedimentary water in the littoral zone of Tonle Sap Lake Cambodia. Water 13(13):1797. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3390/w13131797
Chavan SV, Tyagi K, Sharma A, Sadannava MK, Girmal SB (2020). Probiotic technology-a novel approach in scouring of textiles. J Text Sci Eng 10:5. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.37421/jtese.2020.10.416
Cheung E C, Vousden KH (2022) The role of ROS in tumor development and progression. Nat Rev Cancer 1–18. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1038/s41568-021-00435-0
Chilakamarry CR, Sakinah AM, Zularisam AW, Sirohi R, Khilji IA, Ahmad N, Pandey A (2022) Advances in solid-state fermentation for bioconversion of agricultural wastes to value-added products: opportunities and challenges. Bioresour Technol 343:126065. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.biortech.2021.126065
Chmelová D, Legerská B, Kunstová J, Ondrejovič M, Miertuš S (2022) The production of laccases by white-rot fungi under solid-state fermentation conditions. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 38(2):1–20. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/s11274-021-03207-y
Chowdhury MA, Pandit P (2022) Chemical processing of knitted fabrics. Adv Knit Technol 503–536. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/B978-0-323-85534-1.00002-7 Woodhead Publishing
Christopher M, Sreeja-Raju A, Kooloth-Valappil P, Gokhale DV, Sukumaran RK (2022) Cellulase hyper-producing fungus Penicillium janthinellum NCIM 1366 elaborates a wider array of proteins involved in transport and secretion, potentially enabling a diverse substrate range. Bioenerg Res 1–13. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/s12155-022-10407-3
Chukwuma OB, Rafatullah M, Tajarudin HA, Ismail N (2021) A review on bacterial contribution to lignocellulose breakdown into useful bio-products. Int J Environ Res Publ Health 18(11):6001. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3390/ijerph18116001
Costa FN, de Souza LJ, Valério A, de Souza AA, de Oliveira D (2021) Utilization of montmorillonite in biostoning process as a strategy for effluent reuse. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 96(4):890–898. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1002/jctb.6597
Cremonesi P, Casoli A (2021) Enzymes as tools for conservation of works of art. J Cult Herit 50:73–87. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.culher.2021.06.005
da Silva CJG, de Medeiros AD, de Amorim JDP, do Nascimento HA, Converti A, Costa AFS, Sarubbo LA, (2021) Bacterial cellulose bio textiles for the future of sustainable fashion: a review. Environ Chem Lett 19(4):2967–2980. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/s10311-021-01214-x
Da Vinha FNM, Gravina-Oliveira MP, Franco MN, Macrae A, da Silva Bon EP, Nascimento RP, Coelho RRR (2010) Cellulase production by Streptomycesviridobrunneus scpe-09 using lignocellulosic biomass as inducer substrate. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 164:256–267. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/s12010-010-9132-8
Danso B, Ali SS, Xie R, Sun J (2022) Valorisation of wheat straw and bioethanol production by a novel xylanase-and cellulase-producing Streptomyces strain isolated from the wood-feeding termite Microcerotermes species. Fuel 310:122333. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.fuel.2021.122333
Das P, Kumar P, Kumar M, Solanki R, Kapur MK (2017) Purification and molecular characterization of chitinases from soil actinomycetes. Afr J Microbiol Res 11(27):1086–1102. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.5897/AJMR2017.8612
Das D, Kalra I, Mani K, Salgaonkar BB, Braganca JM (2019) Characterization of extremely halophilic archaeal isolates from Indian salt pans and their screening for production of hydrolytic enzymes. Environ Sustain 1–13. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/s42398-019-00077-x
De Oliveira CRS, da Silva Júnior AH, Mulinari J, Immich APS (2021) Textile re-engineering: eco-responsible solutions for a more sustainable industry. Sustain Prod Consumpt 28:1232–1248. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.spc.2021.08.001
De Souza Lima J, Immich APS, de Araújo PHH, de Oliveira D (2022) Cellulase immobilized on kaolin as a potential approach to improve the quality of knitted fabric. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng. 1–10. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/s00449-021-02686-5
Dessie W, Tang J, Wang M, Luo X, Liu X, Qin Z (2022) One-pot conversion of industrial hemp residue into fermentable feedstocks using a green catalyst and enzyme cocktails generated by solid-state fermentation. Indust Crop Prod 182:114885. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.indcrop.2022.114885
Dey P, Rangarajan V, Singh J, Nayak J, Dilip KJ (2021) Current perspective on improved fermentative production and purification of fungal cellulases for successful biorefinery applications: a brief review. Biomas Conv Bioref 1–29. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/s13399-020-01227-6
Diasa PV, Ramosa KO, Padilhab IQ, Araújob DA, Santosa SF, Silvaa FL (2014) Optimization of cellulase production by Bacillus sp. isolated from sugarcane cultivated soil. Chem Eng 38:277–282. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3303/CET1438047
Eid BM, Ibrahim NA (2021) Recent developments in sustainable finishing of cellulosic textiles employing biotechnology. J Clean Prod 284:124701. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124701
Ejaz U, Sohail M, Ghanemi A (2021) Cellulases: from bioactivity to a variety of industrial applications. Biomim 6(3):44. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3390/biomimetics6030044
El Baz AF, Shetaia YM, Shams Eldin HA, ElMekawy A (2018) Optimization of cellulase production by Trichodermaviride using response surface methodology. Curr Biotechnol 7:19–25. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.2174/2211550105666160115213402
El-Naggar NEA, El-Shweihy NM (2020) Identification of cholesterol-assimilating actinomycetes strain and application of statistical modeling approaches for improvement of cholesterol oxidase production by Streptomyces anulatus strain NEAE-94. BMC Microbiol 20:84. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s12866-020-01775-x
El-Newashy RF, Taleb MA, Ali MA, Mowafi S (2021) Wool fabrics with improved performance and comfort characteristics using functional polysiloxane. Silicon. 1–12. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/s12633-021-01230-0
Elsababty ZE, Abdel-Aziz SH, Ibrahim AM, Guirgis AA, Dawwam GE (2022) Purification, biochemical characterization, and molecular cloning of cellulase from Bacillus licheniformis strain Z9 isolated from soil. J Genet Eng Biotechnol 20(1):1–10. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s43141-022-00317-4
El-Sayed H., Abou Taleb, M. Mowafi, S. (2021). Potential applications of textile wastes and by-products in preparation of textile auxiliaries. Egypt J Chem 64(8): 4433–4447. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.21608/EJCHEM.2021.79398.3899
El Sheikha AF, Ray RC (2022) Bioprocessing of horticultural wastes by solid-state fermentation into value-added/innovative bioproducts: a review. Food Rev Int 1–56. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1080/87559129.2021.2004161
Faheina Junior GS, Sousa KA, Zilli JE, Vergara C, Pinto GA, Santiago-Aguiar, RS (2022) Enhanced cellulase production by Talaromyces amestolkiae CMIAT055 using banana Pseudostem. Wast Biomas Valori 1–12. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.21203/rs.3.rs-726111/v1
Fasiku SA, Ogunsola OF, Fakunle A, Olanbiwoninu AA (2020) Isolation of bacteria with the potential of producing extracellular enzymes (amylase, cellulase and protease) from soil samples. J Adv Microbiol 21–26. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.9734/JAMB/2020/v20i330224
Fatokun EN, Nwodo UU, Okoh AI (2016) Classical optimization of cellulase and xylanase production by a marine Streptomyces species. Appl Sci 6:286. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3390/app6100286
Felgueiras C, Azoia NG, Gonçalves C, Gama M, Dourado F (2021) Trends on the cellulose-based textiles: raw materials and technologies. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 29(9):608826. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3389/fbioe.2021.608826
Fierro F, Vaca I, Castillo NI, García-Rico RO, Chávez R (2022) Penicillium chrysogenum, a vintage model with a cutting-edge profile in biotechnology. Microorganisms 10(3):573. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3390/microorganisms10030573
Gad AM, Suleiman WB, El-Sheikh HH, Elmezayen HA, Beltagy EA (2022) Characterization of cellulase from Geotrichum candidum strain Gad1 approaching bioethanol production. Arab J Sci Eng 1–14. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/s13369-021-06391-z
Garcia IG, Simal-Gandara J, Gullo M (2022) Advances in food, bioproducts and natural byproducts for a sustainable future: from conventional to innovative processes. Appl Sci 12(6):2893. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3390/app12062893
Gautam SP, Bundela PS, Pandey AK, Khan J, Awasthi MK, Sarsaiya S (2011) Optimization for the production of cellulase enzyme from the municipal solid waste residue by two novel cellulolytic fungi. Int Biotechnol Res 1–8. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.4061/2011/810425
Gedarawatte ST, Ravensdale JT, Al-Salami H, Dykes GA, Coorey R (2021) Antimicrobial efficacy of nisin-loaded bacterial cellulose nanocrystals against selected meat spoilage lactic acid bacteria. Carbohydr Poly 251:117096. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.117096
George SP, Ahmad A, Rao MB (2001) Studies on carboxymethylcellulose produced by an alkalothermophilic actinomycete. Biores Technol 77:171–175. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/S0960-8524(00)00150-4
Golinska P, del Carmen Montero-Calasanz M, Świecimska M, Yaramis A, Igual JM, Bull AT, Goodfellow M (2020) Modestobacter excelsi sp. nov., a novel actinobacterium isolated from a high altitude Atacama Desert soil. Syst Appl Microbiol 43(1):126051. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.syapm.2019.126051
Gomes M, Rondelez Y, Leibler L (2022) Lessons from biomass valorization for improving plastic-recycling enzymes. Annual Rev Chem Biomol Eng 13. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1146/annurev-chembioeng-092120-091054
Gong X, Xiang W, Cao X, Yu Y, Hao Y, Li L, et al. (2020) Microbispora cellulosiformans sp. nov., a novel actinomycete with cellulase activity isolated from soil in the cold region. Anton van Leeuwenhoek 1–10. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/s10482-020-01477-4
Gouveia IC, Fiadeiro JM, Queiroz JA (2008) Combined bio-carbonization and dyeing of wool: a possibility using cell wall-degrading enzymes and 1:1 metal-complex dyes. Eng Life Sci 8:250–259. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1002/elsc.200700055
Goyari S, Devi SS, Kalita MC, Talukdar NC (2014) Population, diversity and characteristics of cellulolytic microorganisms from the Indo-Burma biodiversity hotspot. Springerplus 3(1):1–9. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/2193-1801-3-700
Graham JE, Clark ME, Nadler DC, Huffer S, Chokhawala HA, Rowland SE, Blanch HW, Clark DS, Robb FT (2011) Identification and characterization of a multidomain hyperthermophilic cellulase from an archaeal enrichment. Nat Com 2(1):1–9. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1038/ncomms1373
Greff B, Szigeti J, Nagy Á, Lakatos E, Varga L (2022) Influence of microbial inoculants on co-composting of lignocellulosic crop residues with farm animal manure: a review. J Environ Manage 302:114088. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.114088
Grigorevski de Lima AL, Pires do Nascimento R, da Silva Bon EP, Coelho RRR, (2005) Streptomyces drozdowiczii cellulase production using agro-industrial by-products and its potential use in the detergent and textile industries. Enzym Microb Technol 37:272–277. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.enzmictec.2005.03.016
Guan Y, Zhu H, Zhu Y, Zhao H, Shu L, Song J, Yang M (2022) Microbial consortium composed of Cellulomonas ZWJ-6 and Acinetobacter DA-25 improves straw lignocellulose degradation. Arch Microbiol 204(2):1–10. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/s00203-021-02748-y
Guerriero G, Sergeant K, Legay S, Hausman JF, Cauchie HM, Ahmad I, Siddiqui KS (2018) Novel insights from comparative in silico analysis of green microalgal cellulases. Int J Mol Sci 19(6):1782. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3390/ijms19061782
Gupta S, Kelkar-Mane V (2022) Use of uni-enzyme on cotton knitted fabric and its comparison with the commercial formulation. India J Fibre Text Res 46(4): 349–353. http://op.niscair.res.in/index.php/IJFTR/article/view/46218/465480311
Haile S, Ayele A (2022) Pectinase from microorganisms and its industrial applications. Sci World J 11:2022. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1155/2022/1881305
Hasan MZ, Asif AAH, Razzaque A, Hasan MR, Sur S, Faruque MO (2021) An experimental investigation of different washing processes on various properties of stretch denim fabric. J Mater Sci Chem Eng 9;01:1. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.4236/msce.2021.91001
Helal GA, Khalil RR, Galal YG, Soliman SM, Abd Elkader RS (2022) Studies on cellulases of some cellulose-degrading soil fungi. Arch Microbiol 204(1):1–16. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/s00203-021-02705-9
Hildebrandt J, Thrän D, Bezama A (2021) The circularity of potential bio-textile production routes: comparing life cycle impacts of bio-based materials used within the manufacturing of selected leather substitutes. J Clean Prod. 287:125470. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125470
Hoque MT, Mazumder NUS, Islam MT (2021) Enzymatic wet processing. Sustain Pract Text Indust 87–110. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1002/9781119818915.ch4
Hosseini E, Solouki A, Haghshenas M, Ghasemzadeh M, Schoenwaelder SM (2022) Agitation-dependent biomechanical forces modulate GPVI receptor expression and platelet adhesion capacity during storage. Thrombosis J 20(1):1–14. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s12959-021-00359-7
Ibbett R, Gaddipati S, Hill S, Tucker G (2013) Structural reorganisation of cellulose fibrils in hydrothermally deconstructed lignocellulosic biomass and relationships with enzyme digestibility. Biotechnol Biofuel 6(1):1–5. http://www.biotechnologyforbiofuels.com/content/6/1/33
Idris ASO, Pandey A, Rao SS, Sukumaran RK (2017) Cellulase production through solid-state tray fermentation, and its use for bioethanol from sorghum stover. Bioresour Technol 242:265–271. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.03.092
Imran M, Anwar Z, Irshad M, Javid A, Hussain A, Ali S (2017) Optimization of cellulase production from a novel strain of Aspergillustubingensis IMMIS2 through response surface methodology. Biocataly Agr Biotechnol 12:191–198. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.bcab.2017.10.005
Imran M, Bano S, Nazir S, Javid A, Asad MJ, Yaseen A (2019) Cellulases production and application of cellulases and accessory enzymes in pulp and paper industry: a review. PSM Biol Res 4(1): 29–39. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/327166027
Indumathi T, Jayaraj R, Kumar PS, Krishnaswamy VG, Ghfar AA, Govindaraju S (2022) Biological approach in deinking of waste paper using bacterial cellulose as an effective enzyme catalyst. Chemosphere 287: 132088. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.132088
Intasit R, Khunrae P, Meeinkuirt W, Soontorngun N (2022) Fungal pretreatments of Napier grass and sugarcane leaves for high recovery of lignocellulosic enzymes and methane production. Ind Crop Prod 180:114706. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.indcrop.2022.114706
Iram A, Cekmecelioglu D, Demirci A (2022) Salt and nitrogen amendment and optimization for cellulase and xylanase production using dilute acid hydrolysate of distillers’ dried grains with solubles (DDGS) as the feedstock. Bioproc Biosyst Eng 1–14. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/s00449-021-02676-7
Ire FS, Okoli AO, Ezebuiro V (2018) Production and optimization of cellulase from Penicillium sp. using corn-cob and pawpaw fiber as substrates. J Adv Microbiol 1–10. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.9734/JAMB/2018/39227
Ishchi T, Ragi SG (2019) Husk as Substrate for Cellulase Production Under Temperature Mediated Solid State Fermentation by Streptomyces Sp. Am J Biosci. 7(4):77–81. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.11648/j.ajbio.20190704.11
Islam F, Roy N (2018) Screening, purification and characterization of cellulase from cellulase producing bacteria in molasses. Baseboard Mgt Control Res Not 445–450. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s13104-018-3558-4
Islam MT (2021) Enzymatic wet processing. Sustain Pract Text Indust 87. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1002/9781119818915.ch4
Isola D, Bartoli F, Meloni P, Caneva G, Zucconi L (2022) Black fungi and stone heritage conservation: ecological and metabolic assays for evaluating colonization potential and responses to traditional biocides. Appl Sci 12(4):2038. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3390/app12042038
Jagajanantha P, Morey M, Satankar V, Mageshwaran V (2022) Bio-scouring of non-spinnable cotton by a crude enzyme of a new fungal strain Aspergillus sp. VM-1, isolated from banana pseudostem waste. Wast Biomas Valor 13(4):1849–1858. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/s12649-021-01621-9
Javed Z, Tripathi GD, Mishra M, Dashora K (2021) Actinomycetes–the microbial machinery for the organic-cycling, plant growth, and sustainable soil health. Biocatal Agric Biotechnol 31:101893. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.bcab.2020.101893
Jayasekara S, Ratnayake R (2019) Microbial cellulases: an overview and applications. Cellulose 2:22. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.5772/intechopen.84531
Jeennor S, Anantayanon J, Chutrakul C, Panchanawaporn S, Laoteng K (2022) Novel pentose-regulated promoter of Aspergillus oryzae with application in controlling heterologous gene expression. Biotechnol Rep 33:e00695. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.btre.2021.e00695
Jiao H, Song X, Lai C, Fang H, Song Y, Zhu J (2021) Progress in preparation of cellulase from lignocellulose using fungi. Biotechnology and bioprocess engineering. 1–16. Biotechnol Bioproc Eng 871–886. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/s12257-021-0282-z
Jo SU, Lee SJ, Kim HS, Eom JS, Choi Y, Oh DS, Bae D, Lee SS (2022) Effects of oriental medicinal plants on the reduction of methane production mediated by microbial population. Ital J Animal Sci 21(1):522–531. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1080/1828051X.2022.2046192
Joshi S, Choudhary M, Srivastava N (2021) Cellulase production using different microbial sources. Curr Stat Fut Scop Microbial Cell 1–17. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/B978-0-12-821882-2.00009-0. Elsevier
Junior AF, Guedes EH, da Silva Soares CM, Cunha MG, dos Santos AL, Aguiar AO, Martins AL (2022) Isolation and characterization of halophilic strains from beef jerky. Res Soci Dev 11(3): 11(3):e21511326368. https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/26368
Kabaivanova L, Hubenov V, Dimitrova L, Simeonov I, Wang H, Petrova P (2022) Archaeal and bacterial content in a two-stage anaerobic system for efficient energy production from agricultural wastes. Mol 27;(5):1512. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.33448/rsd-v11i3.26368
Kabatesi JC, Wang JP (2022) Separating silver from tin-silver alloy residue: effect of agitation rate. Met 12(2):177. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3390/met12020177
Kabir SMM, Koh J (2021) Sustainable textile processing by enzyme applications. Biodegrad https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.5772/intechopen.97198. IntechOpen
Kalogeropoulou A, Plioni I, Dimitrellou D, Soupioni M, Nigam PS, Kanellaki M, Koutinas AA (2022) Biosynthesis of fuel-grade ethanol from cellobiose by a cell-factory of non-GMO Saccharomyces cerevisiae/starch-gel-cellulase. Fuel 313:122986. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.fuel.2021.122986
Kaur HP, Joshi D (2015) Optimization of cellulase produced by fungus isolated from water. World J Pharm Sci 4:521–534. www.wjpps.com
Kaur K, Verma RK (2021) Fungal resources: current utilization, prospects, and challenges. New Fut Dev Microbiol Biotechnol Bioeng 15–38. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/B978-0-12-821005-5.00002-8. Elsevier
Kaur P, Taggar MS, Kaur J (2020) Cellulolytic microorganisms: diversity and role in conversion of rice straw to bioethanol. Cell Chem Technol 54:613–34. https://www.cellulosechemtechnol.ro/pdf/CCT7-8(2020)/p.613-634.pdf
Khan M, Singh T, Pal DB, Khan S, Ahmad S, Jandrajupalli SB, Srivastava N (2022) Enhanced production of bacterial hydrolytic endoglucanase enzyme using waste leaves of water hyacinth and its thermal stability under the influence of TiO2 nanoparticles. Biomass Conversion Bioref 1–7. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/s13399-022-02421-4
Kieliszek M, Pobiega K, Piwowarek K, Kot AM (2021) Characteristics of the proteolytic enzymes produced by lactic acid bacteria. Mol 26(7):1858. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3390/molecules26071858
Kinet R, Destain J, Hiligsmann S, Thonart P, Delhalle L, Taminiau B, Delvigne F (2015) Thermophilic and cellulolytic consortium isolated from composting plants improves anaerobic digestion of cellulosic biomass: toward a microbial resource management approach. Biores Technol 189:138–144. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.biortech.2015.04.010
Korsa G, Masi C, Konwarh R, Tafesse M (2022) Harnessing the potential use of cellulolytic Klebsiella oxytoca (M21WG) and Klebsiella sp. (Z6WG) isolated from the guts of termites (Isoptera). Ann Microbiol 72(1):1–15. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s13213-021-01662-4
Kothari D, Lee JH, Chon JW, Seo KH, Kim SK (2019) Improved astaxanthin production by Xanthophyllomyces dendrorhous SK984 with oak leaf extract and inorganic phosphate supplementation. Food Sci Biotechnol 28(4):1171–1176. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/s10068-019-00604-w
Krishnaswamy VG, Sridharan R, Kumar PS, Fathima MJ (2022) Cellulase enzyme catalyst producing bacterial strains from vermicompost and its application in low-density polyethylene degradation. Chemosphere 288:132552. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.132552
Kumar V, Sharma DK, Bansal V, Mehta D, Sangwan RS, Yadav SK (2019) Efficient, and economic process for the production of bacterial cellulose from the isolated strain of Acetobacterpasteurianus RSV 4 bacterium. Biores Technol 275:430–433. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.biortech.2018.12.042
Kumar V, Mitra D, Rani A, Suyal DC, Gautam BPS, Jain L, Soni R (2022) Bio-inoculants for biodegradation and bioconversion of agro waste: status and prospects. Bioremed Environ Pol 351–367. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/978-3-030-86169-8_16
Kurt AS, Cekmecelioglu D (2021) Bacterial cellulase production using grape pomace hydrolysate by shake-flask submerged fermentation. Conver Bioref 1–8. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/s13399-021-01595-7
Laga SK (2022) Biotechnological approaches in scouring of textile materials. Appl Biotechnol Sustain Text Prod 75–97. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/B978-0-323-85651-5.00006-2 Woodhead Publishing
Lakshmi ES, Rao MN, Sudhamani M (2020) Response surface methodology-artificial neural network-based optimization and strain improvement of cellulase production by Streptomyces sp. J Biosci 36:1390–1402. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.14393/BJ-v36n4a2020-48006
Larson JA, Bagley DM (2022) Sessile and planktonic microbial taxonomy of a methanogenic cellulolytic enrichment reactor sourced from the organic fraction of municipal solid waste. J Environ Eng 148(4):04022004. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0001978
Leghlimi H, Meraihi Z, Boukhalfa-Lezzar H, Copinet E, Duchiron F (2013) Production and characterization of cellulolytic activities produced by Trichodermalongibrachiatum (GHL). Afr J Biotechnol 12:1–11. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.5897/AJB12.917
Leo VV, Ramesh N, Singh BP (2019) Microorganisms as an efficient tool for cellulase production: availability, diversity, and efficiency. New Fut Devnt Microbial Biotechnol Bioeng 45–61. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/B978-0-444-64223-3.00004-7 Elsevier
Leoni C, Manzari C, Tran H, Golyshin PN, Pesole G, Volpicella M, Ceci LR (2022) Identification of an amylomaltase from the halophilic archaeon Haloquadratum walsbyi by functional metagenomics: structural and functional insights. Life 12(1):85. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3390/life12010085
Li JX, Zhang F, Jiang DD, Li J, Wang FL, Zhang Z, Wang W, Zhao XQ (2020) Diversity of cellulase-producing filamentous fungi from Tibet and transcriptome analysis of a superior cellulase producer Trichoderma harzianum LZ117. Front Microbiol 11:1617. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3389/fmicb.2020.01617
Liang YL, Zhang Z, Wu M, Wu Y, Feng JX (2014) Isolation, screening, and identification of cellulolytic bacteria from natural reserves in the subtropical region of China and optimization of cellulase production by Paenibacillus terrae ME27–1. Int BioMed Res 1–13. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1155/2014/512497
Libardi N, Soccol CR, de Carvalho JC, de Souza Vandenberghe LP (2019) Simultaneous cellulase production using domestic wastewater and bioprocess effluent treatment–a biorefinery approach. Biores Technol 276:42–50. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.biortech.2018.12.088
Lin L (2022) Bottom-up synthetic ecology study of microbial consortia to enhance lignocellulose bioconversion. Biotechnol Biofuel Bioprod 15(1):1–15. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s13068-022-02113-1
Linton SM (2020) The structure and function of cellulase (endo-β-1, 4-glucanase) and hemicellulase (β-1, 3-glucanase and endo-β-1, 4-mannase) enzymes in invertebrates that consume materials ranging from microbes, algae to leaf litter. Comp Biochem Physiol Part B: Biochem Mol Biol 240:110354. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.cbpb.2019.110354
Liu D, Zhang R, Yang X, Wu H, Xu D, Tang Z, Shen Q (2011) Thermostablecellulase production of Aspergillusfumigatus Z5 under solid-state fermentation and its application in degradation of agricultural wastes. Int Biodeter Biodegrad 65:717–725. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.ibiod.2011.04.005
Liu X (2020) Microbial technology for the sustainable development of energy and environment. Biotechnol Rep 27. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.btre.2020.e00486
Lu T, Gao H, Liao B, Wu J, Zhang W, Huang J, Liu M, Huang J, Chang Z, Jin M, Yi Z, Jiang D (2020) Characterization and optimization of production of bacterial cellulose from strain CGMCC 17276 based on the whole-genome analysis. Carbohydr Poly 232–115788. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.115788
Lübeck M, Lübeck PS (2022) Fungal cell factories for efficient and sustainable production of proteins and peptides. Microorg 10(4):753. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3390/microorganisms10040753
Luo W, Wang J, Liu XB, Li H, Pan H, Gu Q, Yu X (2013) A facile and efficient pretreatment of corncob for bioproduction of butanol. Biores Technol 140:86–89. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.biortech.2013.04.063
Maiti S, Kulkarni K, Adivarekar RV (2018) Biotechnology in textile wet processing. J Glob Biomed Sci 2:7–13. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2017.05.034
Malik AD, Furtado IJ (2022) Isolation of Halomicroarcula pellucida strain GUMF5, an archaeon from the Dead Sea-Israel possessing cellulase. 3 Biotechnol 12;(1): 1–11. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/s13205-021-03090-2
Mattam AJ, Chaudhari YB, Velankar HR (2022) Factors regulating cellulolytic gene expression in filamentous fungi: an overview. Microbial Cell Fact 21(1):1–19. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s12934-022-01764-x
Maus I, Rumming M, Bergmann I, Heeg K, Pohl M, Nettmann E, Jaenicke S, Blom J, Pühler A, Schlüter A, Sczyrba A (2018) Characterization of Bathyarchaeota genomes assembled from metagenomes of biofilms residing in mesophilic and thermophilic biogas reactors. Biotechnol Biofuel 11(1):1–3. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s13068-018-1162-4
Maus I, Bremges A, Stolze Y, Hahnke S, Cibis KG, Koeck DE, Schlüter A (2017) Genomics and prevalence of bacterial and archaeal isolates from biogas-producing microbiomes. Biotechnol Biofuel 10:264. https://link.springer.com/article/https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s13068-017-0947-1
Mazotto AM, de Ramos Silva J, de Brito LAA, Rocha NU, de Souza Soares A (2021) How can microbiology help to improve sustainability in the fashion industry. Environ Technol Innov 23:101760. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.eti.2021.101760
Melendez JR, Mátyás B, Hena S, Lowy DA, El Salous A (2022) Perspectives in the production of bioethanol: a review of sustainable methods, technologies, and bioprocesses. Renewab Sustain Energ Rev 160:112260. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.rser.2022.112260
Melgarejo T, Oakley BB, Krumbeck JA, Tang S, Krantz A, Linde A (2021) Assessment of bacterial and fungal populations in urine from clinically healthy dogs using next-generation sequencing. J Vet Intern Med 35(3):1416–1426. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1111/Jvim.16104
Meliani MF, Denis F, Mohamed-Benkada M, Gabed N, Caruso A, Callac N, Abi-Ayad SME (2022) Characterization of actinomycetes strains isolated from Cheliff estuary in the north-west of Algeria. Jordan J Biol Sci 15(01):7–14. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.54319/jjbs/150102
Meng E, Chen CL, Liu CC, Liu CC, Chang SJ, Cherng JH, Wang HH, Wu ST (2019) Bioapplications of bacterial cellulose polymers conjugated with resveratrol for epithelial defect regeneration. Polymers 11:1048. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3390/polym11061048
Mevada VA, Beladiya UH, Gandhi HR, Mangrola AV, Patel RK (2022) Alkalophiles: environmental distribution, taxonomy, physiology, bioenergetics, a survival mechanism, and enzymes. Phys Genom Biotechnol Appl Extrem 35–64. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.4018/978-1-7998-9144-4.ch003 IGI Global
Mitri S, Salameh SJ, Khelfa A, Leonard E, Maroun RG, Louka N, Koubaa M (2022) Valorization of brewers’ spent grains: pretreatments and fermentation, a review. Ferment 8(2):50. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3390/fermentation8020050
Mmango-Kaseke Z, Okaiyeto K, Nwodo U, Mabinya L, Okoh A (2016) Optimization of cellulase and xylanase production by Micrococcus species under submerged fermentation. Sustain 8:1168. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3390/su8111168
Mohammadipour Z, Enayatizamir N, Ghezelbash G, Moezzi A (2021) Bacterial diversity and chemical properties of wheat straw-based compost leachate and screening of cellulase producing bacteria. Waste Biomass Valor 12(3):1293–1302. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/s12649-020-01119-w
Monclaro AV, Silva CDOG, Gomes HAR, de Souza Moreira LR, Ferreira Filho EX (2022) The enzyme interactome concept in filamentous fungi linked to biomass valorization. Biores Technol 344:126200. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.biortech.2021.126200
Mondal S, Halder SK, Mondal KC (2022) Tailoring in fungi for next-generation cellulase production with special reference to CRISPR/CAS system. Syst Microbiol Biomanufact 2(1):113–129. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/s43393-021-00045-9
Montes M, Cervantes M, Vásquez A, Aguilar V, García P, Del Castillo I (2022) Optimization of the production of biogas in anaerobic digestion by the addition of hydrolytic microorganisms. J Environ Sci Eng 11:8–12. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.17265/2162-5298/2022.01.002
Mukherjee A, Patra BR, Pattnaik F, Okolie JA, Sonil N, Dalai AK (2022) Biomethane production through anaerobic digestion of lignocellulosic biomass and organic wastes. Biomethane. 61–92. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3390/en15082940
Mumtaz M, Baqar Z, Hussain N, Bilal M, Azam HM, Iqbal HM (2022) Application of nanomaterials for enhanced production of biodiesel, bio oil, biogas, bioethanol, and biohydrogen via lignocellulosic biomass transformation. Fuel. 315:122840. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.fuel.2021.122840
Mustafa M, Ali L, Islam W, Noman A, Zhou C, Shen L, Zhu T, Can L, Nasif O, Gasparovic K, Gao J (2022) Heterologous expression and characterization of glycoside hydrolase with its potential applications in the hyperthermic environment. Saudi J Biol Sci 29(2):751–757. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.sjbs.2021.09.076
Nabot M, Guérin M, Sivakumar D, Remize F, Garcia C (2022) Variability of bacterial homopolysaccharide production and properties during food processing. Biol 11(2):171. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3390/biology11020171
Naresh S, Kunasundari B, Gunny AA, Teoh YP, Shuit SH, Ng QH, Hoo PY (2019) Isolation and partial characterization of thermophilic cellulolytic bacteria from North Malaysian tropical mangrove soil. Trop Life Sci Res 30(1):123. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.21315/tlsr2019.30.1.8
Nascimento FVD, Lemes AC, Castro AMD, Secchi AR, Zarur Coelho MA (2022) A temporal evolution perspective of lipase production by yarrow lipolytica in solid-state fermentation. Proc 10(2):381. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3390/pr10020381
Nayak R, Nguyen L, Patnaik A, Khandual A (2021) Fashion waste management problem and sustainability: a developing country perspective. In Wast Mgnt Fash Text Indust 79:3–29. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/B978-0-12-818758-6.00001-6. Elsevier, Woodhead Publishing
Nguyen HT, Saha N, Ngwabebhoh FA, Zandraa O, Saha T, Saha P (2021a) Kombucha-derived bacterial cellulose from diverse wastes: a prudent leather alternative. Cellulose 28(14):9335–9353. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/s10570-021-04100-5
Nguyen TK, Huynh BN, Thai HN, Tran TN, Truong TT, Vu TK (2021b) Production of bacterial cellulose films by Gluconoacetobacter xylinus for lipase immobilization. J Tech Educ 17:1–3. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.54644/jte.67.2021.1083
Nisar K, Abullah R, Kaleem A, Iqtedar M, Iftikar T (2022) Optimization and production kinetics for cellulases by a wild and mutant strain of Thermomyces dupontii in stirred tank reactor. Acta Scientiarum Technol 44:e57664. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3932-6297
Nisha P (2015) Cellulase production optimization using cellulolytic bacteria. Int J Pharm Chem Biol Sci 5:262–266. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3389/fmicb.2015.01046
Nursyirwani N, Feliatra F, Tanjung A, Harjuni F (2020) Isolation of cellulolytic bacteria from mangrove sediment in Dubai marine station Riau and the antibacterial activity against pathogens. IOP Conference Series: Earth Environ Sci 430(1):012012). https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1088/1755-1315/430/1/012012.IOP Publishing
Oh EJ, Jin YS (2020) Engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae for efficient fermentation of cellulose. FEMS Yeast Res 20(1):foz089. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1093/femsyr/foz089
Olukunle OF, Ayodeji AO, Akinloye PO (2021) Carboxymethyl cellulose (CMCase) from UV-irradiation mutated Bacillus cereus FOA-2 cultivated on plantain (Musa parasidiaca) stalk-based medium: production, purification and characterization. Afr Scient 11:e00691. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.sciaf.2020.e00691
Pandey AK, Negi S (2020) Enhanced cellulase recovery in SSF from Rhizopus oryzae SN5 and immobilization for multi-batch saccharification of carboxymethylcellulose. Biocat Agr Biotechnol 26:101656. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.bcab.2020.101656
Pandit P, Maiti S, Singha K, Maity S, Shanmugasundaram OL (2022) Biotechnological and nano-biotechnological approaches in finishing of textile materials. Appl Biotechnol Sustain Text Prod 173–186. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/B978-0-323-85651-5.00011-6. Woodhead. Publishing
Pang AP, Zhang F, Hu X, Luo Y, Wang H, Durrani S, Wu FG, Li BZ, Zhou Z, Lu Z, Lin F (2021) Glutamine involvement in nitrogen regulation of cellulase production in fungi. Biotechnol Biofuel 14(1):1–6. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s13068-021-02046-1
Papzan Z, Kowsari M, Javan-Nikkhah M, Gohari AM, Limón MC (2021) Strain improvement of Trichoderma spp. through two-step protoplast fusion for cellulase production enhancement. Can J Microbiol 67(5):406–14. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1139/cjm-2020-0438
Parkhey P, Gupta P, Eswari JS (2017) Optimization of cellulase production from isolated cellulolytic bacterium: comparison between genetic algorithms, simulated annealing, and response surface methodology. Chem Eng Com 204(1):28–38. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1080/00986445.2016.1230736
Patel BN, Patel VS, Patel P, Patel KN (2020) Isolation and optimization of cellulase producing actinomycetes from the soil of Mehsana district, Gujarat. Int J Adv Res Biol Sci 7:27–37. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.22192/ijarbs.2020.07.01.004
Paul S, Joshi SR (2022) Industrial perspectives of fungi. Indust Microbiol Biotechnol 81–105. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/978-981-16-5214-1_3. Springer, Singapore
Pazarlioğlu NK, Sariişik M, Telefoncu A (2005) Treating denim fabrics with immobilized commercial cellulases. Process Biochem 40:767–771. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.procbio.2004.02.003
Periyasamy AP, Tehrani-Bagha A (2022) A review of microplastic emission from textile materials and its reduction techniques. Polymer Degrad Stab 109901. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2022.109901
Periyasamy AP, Venkatesan H (2019) Eco-materials in textile finishing. Handbook. Eco Meter 1–23. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/978-3-319-68255-6_55
Perumal AB, Nambiar RB, Moses JA, Anandharamakrishnan C (2022) Nanocellulose: recent trends and applications in the food industry. Food Hydrocolloid 5:107484. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2022.107484
Phuoc NN, Le Hoang Minh Nhut NT, Hong X, Linh NT, Le B (2020) Isolation and characterization of actinomycetes from white leg shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) ponds antagonistic to Vibrio parahaemolyticus. Microbiol Res Int 8:35–42. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.30918/MRI.82.20.015
Poonsrisawat A, Arnthong J, Prathumpai W, Wanlapatit S, Piyachomkwan K, Champreda V, Suwannarangsee S ( 2022) Enhanced viscosity reduction efficacy of cassava root mash by Aspergillus aculeatinus mutant enzyme cocktail. Biomas Conver Bioref 1–10. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/s13399-021-02221-2
Poulsen JS, de Jonge N, Macêdo WV, Dalby FR, Feilberg A, Nielsen JL (2022) Characterisation of cellulose-degrading organisms in an anaerobic digester. Biores Technol 351:126933. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.biortech.2022.126933
Prabhu G, Bhat D, Bhat RM, Selvaraj S (2022) A critical look at bioproducts co-cultured under solid-state fermentation and their challenges and industrial applications. Wast Biomas Valor 1–7. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/s12649-022-01721-0
Prasad P, Singh T, Bedi S (2013) Characterization of the cellulolytic enzyme produced by Streptomyces griseorubens (accession no. AB184139) isolated from Indian soil. J King Saud Univer Sci 25:245–250. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.crmicr.2020.100013
Provin AP, Cubas AL, Dutra AR, Schulte NK (2021) Textile industry and environment: can the use of bacterial cellulose in the manufacture of biotextiles contribute to the sector? Clean Technol Environ Policy 23(10):2813–2825. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/s10098-021-02191-z
Putri AL, Setiawan R ( 2019) Isolation and screening of actinomycetes producing cellulase and xylanase from Mamasa soil, West Sulawesi. In IOP Conference Series: Earth Environ Sci 308(1):012035). https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1088/1755-1315/308/1/012035. IOP Publishing
Qian Y, Zhong L, Hou Y, Qu Y, Zhong Y (2016) Characterization and strain improvement of a hypercellulytic variant, Trichoderma reesei SN1, by genetic engineering for optimized cellulase production in biomass conversion improvement. Front Microbiol 7:1349. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3389/fmicb.2016.01349
Radhakrishnan S (2022) Biotechnological approaches for sustainable pretreatment of textile materials. Appl. Biotechnol Sustain Text Prod 99–133. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/B978-0-323-85651-5.00002-5. Woodhead Publishing
Rahman M, Billah M, Hack-Polay D, Alam MA (2020) The use of biotechnologies in textile processing and environmental. Technol Forecast Soci Chang 159:120204. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120204
Rahman MA, Yun C, Park CH (2021) Development of a superhydrophobic cellulose fabric via enzyme treatment and surface hydrophobization. J Text Res 91(1–2):40–50. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1177/0040517520932232
Raj T, Chandrasekhar K, Kumar AN, Banu JR, Yoon JJ, Bhatia SK, Kim SH (2022) Recent advances in commercial biorefineries for lignocellulosic ethanol production: current status, challenges and future perspectives. Biores Technol 344:126292. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.biortech.2021.126292
Rajulapati V, Dhillon A, Kumar Gali K, Katiyar V, Goyal A (2020) Green bioprocess of degumming of jute fibers and bioscouring of cotton fabric by recombinant pectin methylesterase and pectate lyases from Clostridium thermocellum. Proc Biochem 92:93–104. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.procbio.2020.02.024
Ramamoorthy NK, Sambavi TR, Renganathan S (2019) A study on cellulase production from a mixture of lignocellulosic wastes. Proces Biochem 83:148–158. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.procbio.2019.05.006
Ramesh S, Harrysson OL, Rao PK, Tamayol A, Cormier DR, Zhang Y, Rivero IV (2021) Extrusion bioprinting: recent progress, challenges, and future opportunities. Bioprinting. 21:e00116. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.bprint.2020.e00116
Rani A, Saini KC, Bast F, Varjani S, Mehariya S, Bhatia SK, Funk C (2021) A review on microbial products and their perspective application as antimicrobial agents. Biomol 11(12):1860. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.bprint.2020.e00116
Rashid MR, Rahman MF (2020). Study on fabric and seam strength loss of denim trousers for different washing treatments. J Text Sci Technol 6(03):114. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.4236/jtst.2020.63009
Rasul F, Afroz A, Rashid U, Mehmood S, Sughra K, Zeeshan N (2015) Screening and characterization of cellulase producing bacteria from soil and waste (molasses) of the sugar industry. Int J Biosci 6(3):230–6. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.12692/ijb/6.3.230-238
Rather AH, Khan RS, Wani TU, Beigh MA, Sheikh FA (2022) Overview on immobilization of enzymes on synthetic polymeric nanofibers fabricated by electrospinning. Biotechnol Bioeng 119(1):9–33. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1002/bit.27963
Ratnakomala S, Fahrurrozi F, Yopi Y (2019) Enhancement of Cellulase (CMCase) production from marine actinomycetes Streptomyces sp. Bse 7-9: Optimization of fermentation medium by Response Surface Methodology IOP Conf Ser: Earth Environ Sci 251:012005. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1088/1755-1315/251/1/012005
Rodrigues H CSR, Carvalho AL, Santos LM, Silva ABD, Umsza-Guez MA (2022) Actinobacteria hydrolase producer in solid-state fermentation using lecture. Ciê Agr 46. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1590/1413-7054202246020721
Rosolen RR, Aono AH, Almeida DA, Ferreira JF, Horta MAC, De AS (2022) Network analysis reveals different cellulose degradation strategies across Trichoderma harzianum strains associated with XYR1 and CRE1. Front Gen 13:807243–807243. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3389/fgene.2022.807243
Roth JCG, Hoeltz M, Benitez LB (2020) Current approaches and trends in the production of microbial cellulases using residual lignocellulosic biomass: a bibliometric analysis of the last 10 years. Archiv Microbiol 202(5):935–951. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/s00203-019-01796-9
Ryngajłło M, Krzepkowska MJ, Kubiak K, Ludwicka K, Bielecki S (2020) Towards control of cellulose biosynthesis by Komagataeibacter using systems-level and strain engineering strategies: current progress and perspectives. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 104:6565–6585. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/s00253-020-10671-3
Sadhu S, Saha P, Sen SK, Mayilraj S, Maiti TK (2013) Production, purification and characterization of novel thermotolerant endoglucanase (CMCase) from Bacillus strain isolated from cow dung. Spring plus 2:10. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/2193-1801-2-10
Saif A, Cuccurullo A, Gallipoli D, Perlot C, Bruno AW (2022) Advances in enzyme induced carbonate precipitation and application to soil improvement: a review. Mater 15(3):950. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3390/ma15030950
Sampathkumar K, Kumar V, Sivamani S, Sivakumar N (2019) An insight into fungal cellulases and their industrial applications. Approach Enhance Indust Prod Fung Cell 19–35. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/978-3-030-14726-6_2
Sangkharak K, Vangsirikul P, Janthachat S (2012) Strain improvement and optimization for enhanced production of cellulase in Cellulomonas sp. TSU-03. Afr J Microbiol Res 6:1079–1084. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.5897/AJMR11.1550
Santos G B, de Sousa Francisco Filho Á, da Silva Rodrigues JR, de Souza RR (2022) Cellulase production by Aspergillus niger using urban lignocellulosic waste as substrate: evaluation of different cultivation strategies. J Environ Mgt 305:114431. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.114431
Saravanakumar K, Shanmugam S, Hari A, Usmani Z, Ali DM, Kathiresan K, Gupta VK (2020) Strategies of biotechnological innovations using Trichoderma. Trichoderma. Agri Appl Beyond 325–350. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/978-3-030-54758-5_15
Saravanan P, Muthuvelayudham R, Kannan RR, Viruthagiri T (2012) Optimization of cellulase production using Trichodermareesei by RSM and comparison with genetic algorithm. Front Chem Sci Eng 6:443–452. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/s11705-012-1225-1
Saravanan A, Kumar PS, Jeevanantham S, Karishma S, Vo DVN (2022) Recent advances and sustainable development of biofuels production from lignocellulosic biomass. Biores Technol 344:126203. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.biortech.2021.126203
Saroj P, Narasimhulu K (2022) Biochemical characterization of thermostable carboxymethyl cellulase and β-glucosidase from Aspergillus fumigatus JCM 10253. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 1–25. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/s12010-022-03839-2
Sen A, Kapila R, Chaudhary S, Nigam A (2021) Biotechnological applications of microbial enzymes to replace chemicals in the textile industry-a review. Text Ass 82(2):68–73
Sengupta A, Barik A, Verma SK, Sarkar A (2020) Industrial applications of enzymes derived from Indian mangroves. Biotechnol. Util Mangrov Resour 331–353. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/B978-0-12-819532-1.00015-9
Sethi S, Gupta S (2014) Optimization of cultural parameters for cellulase enzyme production from fungi. Bio Life 2: 989–996. www.biolifejournal.com
Sethi S, Datta A, Gupta B L, Gupta S (2013) Optimization of cellulase production from bacteria isolated from soil. Int Scholar Res Notice 2013. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.5402/2013/985685
Shah F, Mishra S (2020) In vitro optimization for enhanced cellulose-degrading enzyme from Bacillus licheniformis KY962963 associated with a microalgae Chlorococcum sp. using OVAT and statistical modeling. SN Applied Sci 2(11):1–10. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/s42452-020-03697-9
Shah SP, Kalia KS, Patel JS (2015) Optimization of cellulase production by Penicilliumoxalicum using banana agro waste as a substrate. J Gen Appl Microbiol 61:35–43. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.2323/jgam.61.35
Shaikh NM, Patel AA, Mehta SA, Patel ND (2013) Isolation and screening of cellulolytic bacteria inhabiting different environments and optimization of cellulase production. Univ J Environ Res Technol 3(1):39–49. www.environmentaljournal.org
Shajahan S, Moorthy IG, Sivakumar N, Selvakumar G (2017) Statistical modeling and optimization of cellulase production by Bacillus licheniformis NCIM 5556 isolated from the hot spring. Maharashtra India J King Saud Univ Sci 29:302–310. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.jksus.2016.08.001
Sharma S, Yazdani SS (2016) Diversity of microbial cellulase system. New and future developments in microbial. Biotechnol Bioeng 49–64. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/B978-0-444-63507-5.00006-X
Sharma J, Kumar V, Prasad R, Gaur NA (2022) Engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae as a consolidated bioprocessing host to produce cellulosic ethanol: recent advancements and current challenges. Biotechnol Adv 107925. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2022.107925
Shokrkar H, Keighobadi A (2022) Effect of fluid hydrodynamic situations on enzymatic hydrolysis of mixed microalgae: experimental study and simulation. Energ 241:122804. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.energy.2021.122804
Shukla A, Parmar P, Goswami D, Gehlot Y, Vala J, Parmar N, Saraf M (2021) Microbial technologies in textile industries: an elixir for the greener environment. Green Chem Sustain Text 173–189. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/B978-0-323-85204-3.00028-2. Woodhead Publishing
Shukor H, Jalil R, Shoparwe NF (2022) Bioconversion of Malaysia renewable energy resources to biobutanol. Malaysia Renewab Energ Bio-res 117–146. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/978-981-16-9314-4_6. Springer, Singapore
Singh K, Richa K, Bose H, Karthik L, Kumar G, Bhaskara Rao KV (2014) Statistical media optimization and cellulase production from marine Bacillus VITRKHB. 3 Biotechnol 4(6):591–8. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/s13205-013-0173-x
Singh A, Varghese LM, Battan B, Patra AK, Mandhan RP, Mahajan R (2020) Eco-friendly scouring of ramie fibers using crude xylan-pectinolytic enzymes for textile purpose. Environ Sci Pol Res 27(6):6701–6710. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/s11356-019-07424-9
Singh A, Bajar S, Devi A, Pant D (2021) An overview on the recent developments in fungal cellulase production and their industrial applications. Bioresour Technol Rep 14:100652. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.biteb.2021.100652
Singhania RR, Sukumaran RK, Pandey A (2007) Improved cellulase production by Trichoderma reesei RUT C30 under SSF through process optimization. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 142:60–70. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/s12010-007-0019-2
Singhania RR, Ruiz HA, Awasthi MK, Dong CD, Chen CW, Patel AK (2021) Challenges in cellulase bioprocess for biofuel applications. Renewab Sustain Energ Rev 151:111622. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111622
Singhania RR, Patel AK, Tseng YS, Kumar V, Chen CW, Haldar D, Saini JK, Dong CD (2022) Developments in a bioprocess for bacterial cellulose production. Biores Technol 344:126343. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.biortech.2021.126343
Sinjaroonsak S, Chaiyaso T (2020) Optimization of cellulase and xylanase productions by Streptomyces thermocoprophilus TC13W using low cost pretreated oil palm empty fruit bunch. Wast Biomass Valor 11(8):3925–3936. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/s12649-019-00720-y
Siqueira JGW, Rodrigues C, de Souza Vandenberghe L P, Woiciechowski AL, Soccol CR (2020) Current advances in on-site cellulase production and application on lignocellulosic biomass conversion to biofuels: a review. Biomass Bioenerg 132:105419. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.biombioe.2019.105419
Sivasankar P, Poongodi S, Sivakumar K, Al-Qahtani WH, Arokiyaraj S, Jothiramalingam R (2022) Exogenous production of cold-active cellulase from polar Nocardiopsis sp. with increased cellulose hydrolysis efficiency. Archiv Microbiol 204(4):1–9. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/s00203-022-02830-z
Skiba EA, Gladysheva EK, Budaeva VV, Aleshina LA, Sakovich GV (2022) Yield and quality of bacterial cellulose from agricultural waste. Cell 1–13. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/s10570-021-04372-x
Soeka YS, Ilyas M (2020) Production and characterization of cellulases derived from saprophytic fungi PenicilliumbilaiaeInae CC F16. In IOP Conference Series: Earth Environ Sci 591(1):012015. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1088/1755-1315/591/1/012015. IOP Publishing
Son J, Lee KH, Lee T, Kim HS, Shin WH, Oh JM, Koo SM, Yu BJ, Yoo HY, Park C (2022) Enhanced production of bacterial cellulose from miscanthus as sustainable feedstock through statistical optimization of culture conditions. Int J Environ Res Publ Health 19(2):866. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3390/ijerph19020866
Srivastava N, Singh R, Mohammad A, Pal DB, Syed A, Elgorban AM, Mishra PK, Yoon T, Srivastava M, Gupta VK (2022) Graphene oxide-mediated enhanced cellulase production using pomegranate waste following co-cultured condition with improved pH and thermal stability. Fuel. 312:122807. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.fuel.2021.122807v
Streletskii R, Astaykina A, Krasnov G, Gorbatov V (2022) Changes in the bacterial and fungal community of soil under treatment of pesticides. Agronomy 12(1):124. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3390/agronomy12010124
Subathra Devi C, Merlyn Keziah S, Jemimah Naine S, Mohanasrinivasan V (2022) Actinomycetes: microbiology to systems biology. Actinobact 1–35. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/978-981-16-5835-8_1. Springer, Singapore
Sudarshan A, Renuka S, Reshma S, Shilanjali B, Agsar D (2022) Upsurge production of cellulase from maize stover under solid state conditions mediated by Streptomyces enissocaesilis DQ026641. J Appl Biol Biotechnol (01):136–44. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.7324/JABB.2021.100117
Swarna D, Gnanadoss JJ (2020) Screening and molecular characterization of actinomycetes from mangrove soil producing industrially important enzymes. J Scient Res 64:87–95. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.37398/JSR.2020.640211
Tai WY, Tan JS, Lim V, Lee CK (2019) Comprehensive studies on optimization of cellulase and xylanase production by a local indigenous fungus strain via solid-state fermentation using oil palm frond as substrate. Biotechnol Progr 35(3):e2781. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1002/btpr.2781
Tang S, Zhou J, Pan W, Tang R, Ma Q, Xu M, Qi T, Ma Z, Fu H, Wu L (2022) Impact of N application rate on tea (Camellia sinensis) growth and soil bacterial and fungi communities. Plant Soil 1–17. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/s11104-022-05372-x
Tapia-Tussell R, Pereira Patrón A, Alzate-Gaviria L, Lizama-Uc G, Pérez-Brito D, Solis Pereira S (2020) Decolorization of textile effluent by Trametes hirsuta Bm-2 and lac-T as possible main laccase-contributing gene. Curr Microbiol 77(12):3953–4396. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/s00284-020-02188-9
Tatta ER, Imchen M, Moopantakath J, Kumavath R (2022) Bioprospecting of microbial enzymes: current trends in industry and healthcare. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 1–23. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/s00253-022-11859-5
Tawfik A, Ismail S, Elsayed M, Qyyum MA, Rehan M (2022) Sustainable microalgal biomass valorization to bioenergy: key challenges and future perspectives. Chemosphere 133812. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.133812
Teles AS, Chávez DW, Oliveira RA, Bon EP, Terzi SC, Souza EF, Tonon RV (2019) Use of grape pomace for the production of hydrolytic enzymes by solid-state fermentation and recovery of its bioactive compounds. Int Food Res 120:441–448. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.foodres.2018.10.083
Thapa S, Mishra J, Arora N, Mishra P, Li H, O′ Hair J, Bhatti S, Zhou S, (2020) Microbial cellulolytic enzymes: diversity and biotechnology with reference to lignocellulosic biomass degradation. Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol 19:621–648. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/s11157-020-09536-y
Tian W, Gao X, Zhang J, Yu J, Zhang J (2022) Cellulose nanosphere: preparation and applications of the novel nanocellulose. Carbohydr. Poly. 277:118863. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.carbpol.2021.118863
Tomico-Cuenca I, Mach RL, Mach-Aigner AR, Derntl C (2021) An overview on current molecular tools for heterologous gene expression in Trichoderma. Fungal Biol Biotechnol 8(1):1–17. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s40694-021-00119-2
Tuncer M, Kuru A, Isikli M, Sahin N, Celenk FG (2004) Optimization of extracellular endoxylanase, endoglucanase and peroxidase production by Streptomyces sp. F2621 is isolated in Turkey. J Appl Microbiol 97:783–791. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2004.02361.x
Tureck BC, Hackbarth HG, Neves EZ, Garcia MCF, Apati GP, Recouvreux DD OS, Schneider ALDS (2022) Obtaining and characterization of bacterial cellulose synthesized by Komagataeibacter hansenii from alternative sources of nitrogen and carbon. Matéria (Rio de Janeiro) 26. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1590/S1517-707620210004.1392
Ugbenyen AM, Ikhimalo OP (2021) Strain improvement and mass production of beneficial microorganisms for their environmental and agricultural benefit. Microbial Rejuv Pol Environ 1–19. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/978-981-15-7459-7_1. Springer, Singapore
Vasco-Correa J, Capouya R, Shah A, Mitchell TK (2022) Sequential fungal pretreatment of unsterilized Miscanthus: changes in composition, cellulose digestibility and microbial communities. Applied Microbiol Biotechnol 106(5):2263–2279. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/s00253-022-11833-1
Vélez-Mercado MI, Talavera-Caro AG, Escobedo-Uribe KM, Sánchez-Muñoz S, Luévanos-Escareño MP, Hernández-Terán F, Balagurusamy N (2021) Bioconversion of lignocellulosic biomass into value added products under anaerobic conditions: insight into proteomic studies. Int J Mol Sci 22(22):12249. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3390/ijms222212249
Vijayakumar N (2021) Review on halophilic microbes and their applications. Bull Env Pharmacol Life Sci 10:23–36. http://www.bepls.com
Vilela CL, Villela HD, Rachid CT, Carmo FL, Vermelho AB, Peixoto RS (2021) Exploring the diversity and biotechnological potential of cultured and uncultured coral-associated bacteria. Microorganisms 9:2235. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3390/microorganisms9112235
Viswanathan K, Rebecca LJ (2019) Screening of amylase and cellulase enzymes from marine actinomycetes. Res J Pharma Technol 12(8):3787–3790. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.5958/0974-360X.2019.00648.6
Wahart AJ, Staniland J, Miller GJ, Cosgrove SC (2022) Oxidase enzymes as sustainable oxidation catalysts. Royal Soc Open Sci 9(1):211572. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1098/rsos.211572
Weiland S, Hickmann T, Lederer M, Marquardt J, Schwindenhammer S (2021) The 2030 Agenda for sustainable development: transformative change through the sustainable development goals? Pol Gov 9(1):90–5. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.17645/pag.v9i1.4191
Wilson DB (2011) Microbial diversity of cellulose hydrolysis. Curr Opin Microbiol 14:259–263. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.mib.2011.04.004
Yanagisawa M, Asamizu S, Satoh K, Oono Y, Onaka H (2022) Effects of carbon ion beam-induced mutagenesis for the screening of red production-deficient mutants of Streptomyces coelicolor JCM4020. Plos one 17(7):e0270379. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1371/journal.pone.0270379
Zainudin MHM, Zulkarnain A, Azmi AS, Muniandy S, Sakai K, Shirai Y, Hassan MA (2022) Enhancement of agro-industrial waste composting process via the microbial inoculation: a brief review. Agronomy 12(1):198. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3390/agronomy12010198
Zhang S, Chen C, Duan C, Hu H, Li H, Li J, Liu Y, Ma X, Stavik J, Ni Y (2018) Regenerated cellulose by the lyocell process, a brief review of the process and properties. BioRes 13(2):4577–92. https://ojs.cnr.ncsu.edu/index.php/BioRes/article/download/BioRes_13_2_Zhang_Review_Regenerated_Cellulose_Lyocell_Process/6095
Zhao Q, Liu Q, Wang Q, Qin Y, Zhong Y, Gao L, Qu Y (2021) Disruption of the Trichoderma reesei gul1 gene stimulates hyphal branching and reduces broth viscosity in cellulase production. J. Indust. Microbiol. Biotechnol 48(1–2):kuab012. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1093/jimb/kuab012
Zhen J, Tan M, Fu X, Shu W, Zhao X, Yang S, Song H (2020) High-level extracellular production of an alkaline pectate lyase in E coli BL21 (DE3) and its application in bioscouring of cotton fabric. 3 Biotechnol 10:49. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/s13205-019-2022-z
Zheng F, Yang R, Cao Y, Zhang W, Lv X, Meng X, Liu W (2020) Engineering Trichoderma reesei for hyperproduction of cellulases on glucose to efficiently saccharify pretreated corncobs. J Agr Food Chem 68(45):12671–12682. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1021/acs.jafc.0c04663
Zuorro A, Maffei G, Lavecchia R (2016) Optimization of enzyme-assisted lipid extraction from Nannochloropsis microalgae. J Taiwan Instit Chem Eng 67:106–114. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.jtice.2016.08.016
Acknowledgements
We would want to express our gratitude to Addis Ababa Science and Technology University in particular, to create this review paper and conduct various workshops on the scientific art of writing various journals and articles.
Funding
Non-funding/no fund was received from any funding agency or organization towards making this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors GK, RK, CM, AA, and SH carried out and are equally contributed to this review. Also, the authors have approved the latest version of the manuscript and agree to be held accountable for the content therein.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
All listed authors consented to the submission of this manuscript for publication.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Korsa, G., Konwarh, R., Masi, C. et al. Microbial cellulase production and its potential application for textile industries. Ann Microbiol 73, 13 (2023). https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s13213-023-01715-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s13213-023-01715-w